Press Esc to close
Working to COPE guidelines·ICMJE recommendations·EQUATOR reporting standards·ISO 9001:2015·Confidentiality by default
Our Services
We support research publishing, regulatory submissions, editorial services and data analysis for researchers, life-science companies and publishers.
Five service areas
We support researchers, clinicians and research teams with study design, statistics, writing, editing, journal selection and submission.
Six service areas
We prepare clinical study reports, protocols, device and IVD files, payer dossiers and medical communications for pharmaceutical, biotech and device companies.
Three service areas
We provide peer review management, copy editing, specialist review, accessibility reports and exam services for journals, societies, publishers and awarding bodies.
Four services
We provide biostatistics, bioinformatics, predictive modelling and real-world data analysis for research, industry and publishing teams.
Service Scope
We support projects at any stage, whether you have a completed draft, a dataset without a draft, or a manuscript that has been rejected.
We agree the research question, study design, protocol, sample size and analysis plan before data collection or analysis begins.
We collect data to protocol where required, then provide biostatistics, meta-analysis, bioinformatics and machine learning.
We write to the target journal’s structure and the relevant reporting guideline, such as CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE or CARE.
We provide pre-submission peer review, journal selection, formatting, cover letters, submission and reviewer responses.
After acceptance, we produce graphical and video abstracts, posters, plain-language summaries and scientific news reports.
Methodology
Regulatory dossiers, clinical evaluation reports and systematic reviews all depend on a rigorous reading of the literature, with every claim traced back to its source.
Most of the work takes place before writing begins. We search using a reproducible strategy, screen against predefined criteria, appraise the included studies and record the reason for every exclusion. This process allows a document to withstand detailed questions from editors, peer reviewers and regulatory assessors.
We then write up the evidence to the requirements of each destination. The argument, structure and depth of a 4,000-word manuscript differ from those of a Module 2.5 clinical overview, while the underlying evidence remains the same.
Data & analytics
Language errors usually lead to a revision request, but a misspecified statistical model can lead to rejection or a later retraction.
Biostatisticians, bioinformaticians and health economists work on the same project team as the writers and editors. As a result, the analysis plan is agreed before data collection rather than reconstructed afterwards.
Every output is reproducible. You receive the code, the computing environment and the log with the results, so you can answer any reviewer question about how a figure was produced.
Trained field teams and clinical sites collect data to protocol, with case report forms, calibration records, monitoring and an audit trail that supports ethics committee review and journal data-availability checks.
17 submissions screened3 flagged before submission
Quality Assurance
Publishers now screen submissions against a shared pool before editorial review, checking for duplicated text, manipulated images, tortured phrases, undisclosed AI use and citations that do not resolve. A flag raised at one journal can follow a manuscript to other journals.
We run the same checks before you submit. Our review includes similarity and image-integrity screening, verification of every reference against its primary source, and an AI-disclosure review against COPE and ICMJE guidance. Any flagged issue is corrected or explained in your own words before submission.
Who We Support
Our services are available across all subject areas and sectors. The applicable reporting guideline, the regulator or journal, and the intended readership determine how each project is delivered.
Work is assigned by subject, not by availability. The areas below have dedicated expert coverage, and our expert register extends beyond this list, so please ask if your field is not shown.
Regulated sectors require evidence that satisfies both peer reviewers and regulatory assessors. Each sector below has its own documentation requirements and common compliance issues.
Researchers, clinicians, companies and publishers need different kinds of support. We serve the eight groups below, each with services suited to its work.
Why Choose Pubrica
Work is assigned by subject, not by availability. A cardiology trial, for example, is assigned to a subject matter expert who knows the relevant CONSORT extension and can identify an effect size that is implausible against the published literature. This subject knowledge is the main difference between a language edit and a scientific review.
Unpublished data, patient-level datasets and pre-submission manuscripts are handled under signed confidentiality agreements, with access limited to the assigned team. We do not use third-party tools or train any system on your material.
Reviewer responses, major revisions, rebuttal letters and resubmission to a second journal are included in the engagement within the agreed scope, without a new quote.
Client Testimonials
Our Experts
Every project is assigned to a Pubrica subject matter expert who works in its subject area. Our wider panel of 5,000+ subject experts covers biostatistics, medical writing and regulatory writing as well as editing. The editors below are members of this team.
Dr. Athira
Biotechnology
Dr. Benny K
Business
Dr. Carole J
Medicine
Dr. Katharine Hughes
Life sciences
Dr. Monika M
Pharmacology
Dr. Nalini Kannan
Biotechnology
Dr. Rajasekar
Chemistry
Heather Evans
English editing
Ross Taylor
Engineering
Pubrica Academy
Fifty-eight free articles, templates, guidelines, checklists and worked examples are available without an account. Search them here or browse them in the Academy.
How to structure a rebuttal letter that editors can adjudicate quickly, including what to concede and what to defend.
Read articleWhat changed in the 2025 update, and the items cardiovascular submissions most often fail on.
Read articleAligning response criteria reporting with the expectations of high-impact oncology journals.
Read articleFAQs
If you are unsure whether your project fits our services, talk to an expert without requesting a quote.
We provide research, writing, editing, statistical and publication support to authors, institutions, laboratories and publishers, mainly in medicine, life sciences and healthcare. Our work ranges from conducting meta-analyses and editing theses to managing journal submissions and the reviewer responses that follow.
A language edit corrects grammar and style. Our editors hold doctorates or clinical posts in the field they are editing, so they also question the statistics, verify citations against primary sources, and flag claims the data does not support. Issues of this second kind cause most desk rejections.
A standard edit takes five to seven business days and a minor edit two to three. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses and regulatory documents are scoped individually. Expedited turnaround is available on most services and is quoted upfront rather than added later.
Yes. Reviewer responses, major and minor revisions, rebuttal letters and resubmission to a second journal are included in the engagement within the agreed scope. Support continues until the paper is published or you decide to stop.
Every project is covered by a signed confidentiality agreement, access is limited to the assigned team, and material is transferred over encrypted channels. We do not use client material to train anything and we do not pass work to third-party tools.
No. We work within COPE and ICMJE guidance: we provide professional writing, editing and analysis support, which is acknowledged rather than credited as authorship. Scientific and clinical judgement stays with the named authors, and we will tell you when a request would cross that line.
We cover all major clinical and life-science fields, including oncology, cardiology, endocrinology, neurology, psychiatry, radiology, surgery, public health, epidemiology, pharmacology, genomics and health economics. If your field is not listed, please ask, as our expert register covers more fields than are shown here.
How It Works
Our process has four steps, from your first enquiry to publication. You can stop after step two at no cost.
Send a manuscript, dataset, protocol or project brief. All files are transferred over an encrypted channel and covered by confidentiality from receipt.
A Pubrica subject matter expert in your field reviews your material and sends a written assessment of the work required, the assigned expert, the cost and the delivery date. The assessment takes two business days and is free of charge.
Work is assigned to a subject expert, not to whoever is available. You see the expert’s field and credentials before work begins, and you can request a different expert.
You receive tracked changes and a written rationale for each edit, followed by support with revisions, reviewer responses and resubmission within the agreed scope until the work is published or you decide to stop.
The scoping assessment is free and takes two business days. You receive a written summary of the changes we recommend and the reasons for them before any quote.