Free scoping read. A written assessment of your manuscript in two business days, at no cost.

Start one

Home/Therapeutics/Cardiovascular

Cardiovascular Medical Writing, Statistics and Regulatory Documentation

Pubrica supports sponsors, clinical development teams and investigators in cardiovascular disease with medical writing, biostatistics and regulatory documentation. Typical projects include cardiovascular outcome trials, non-inferiority designs, device studies, registry analyses and imaging sub-studies, reported to CONSORT 2025 and its extensions. We prepare protocols, statistical analysis plans, clinical study reports, CTD Module 2 summaries and manuscripts, with clear reporting of composite endpoints and their components. A designated project lead coordinates the protocol, statistical analysis plan, clinical study report and publications to keep data interpretation and messaging consistent.

In this areaOne designated project lead

The reporting guideline and extension depend on your study design. We confirm them during the free scoping read.

Every project includes
  • Writers matched to the therapy area
  • One designated project lead
  • Reporting guideline confirmed
  • Mutual NDA on request
  • You remain the sponsor

Therapy Area Scope

Cardiovascular study types, standards and endpoints

Each therapy area has its own typical study designs, reporting guidelines and endpoint questions. We assign a lead who has worked in cardiovascular disease, so documents follow the right standards from the start.

Study types

Typical study types

Cardiovascular outcome trials, non-inferiority designs, device studies, registry analyses and imaging sub-studies.

Reporting standards

Guidelines we apply

CONSORT 2025 with the non-inferiority and cluster extensions; ICH E9(R1) for estimands; device pathway documentation where hardware is involved.

Key endpoint question

What reviewers examine closely

Composite endpoints: whether the components are of similar clinical importance, and whether the least serious component drives the overall effect.

Common Review Points

Common review points in cardiovascular submissions

These are issues that reviewers and payers often raise in cardiovascular disease. We check for them while preparing documents so they can be addressed before submission.

Points we check

Common reviewer findingComposite results that are positive for hospitalisation but not for mortality need a full component breakdown, which reviewers routinely request.
Payer evidence needsNon-inferiority margins should be justified on clinical grounds. Reviewers challenge margins chosen mainly for feasibility.
Guideline checkIncluded in every free scoping read: an item-by-item check that the guideline extension your design requires has been applied
Consistency checkA check that the clinical overview, study report and publications present consistent data and conclusions

Our Services

Services for cardiovascular programmes

Services are grouped by programme stage. Device and diagnostic work is governed by MDR and IVDR rather than ICH and is covered on the relevant sector pages.

Services can be commissioned individually or as a programme. A designated project lead coordinates the documents to keep data interpretation and messaging consistent.

Who we serve

Who we support in cardiovascular disease

We work with sponsor teams and clinical investigators across these functions.

Teams we work with

Regulatory affairsCTD dossier modules and responses to health-authority questions
Clinical developmentProtocols and clinical study reports written to the applicable reporting guideline
BiostatisticsStatistical analysis plans and estimands suited to the study endpoints
Medical affairsPublication plans and congress content timed to study readouts
Market accessValue dossiers and HTA submissions for assessing agencies
Principal investigatorsPrimary manuscripts and responses to peer reviewers

Our compliance and guideline standards

Guidelines and standards for cardiovascular documents

Each document is written to the guideline and extension your study design requires. We record the edition applied and check that it is the current one.

Applicable standards

Therapy area guidelinesCONSORT 2025 with the non-inferiority and cluster extensions; ICH E9(R1) for estimands; device pathway documentation where hardware is involved.
ICH E3, E6 and E9Study reports, good clinical practice and statistical principles
ICH E9(R1)The estimand framework for defining the treatment effect
ICH M4The common technical document and its modules
PRISMA 2020 and GRADEEvidence synthesis and certainty of evidence
CHEERS 2022Health economic evaluation, to the assessing agency’s reference case
ICMJE and GPP 2022Authorship and good publication practice
ISO 9001:2015The quality management system our process follows

Use of AI Tools

AI tools support search and formatting, not scientific writing

This policy applies to every therapy area and every project timeline.

Our AI policy

Used forLiterature search expansion, de-duplication, reference formatting and consistency checks
Not used forDrafting clinical content, interpreting results or generating text submitted under your name
DisclosedIf a tool was used on a deliverable, the handover states which tool and for what purpose
Your dataNever used to train a model and never sent to a service that would do so

How it works

Our five-step process, starting with a free scoping read

We review your programme before we provide a quote.

One

Scoping read

Free, within two business days. We assess what the programme needs, who would lead it and the likely cost.

Two

Project lead assigned

A lead who has worked in the therapy area is assigned before work starts and stays with the project throughout.

Three

Outline approval

You approve each section and its sources before drafting begins.

Four

Draft and review

Each draft goes through independent review, quality control and reference verification, each signed off separately.

Five

Handover

You receive the deliverable with its working material. Revisions are included within the agreed scope.

After

Follow-up questions

Questions on a document are answered by the writer who prepared it.

Our experts

The team for cardiovascular projects

Writers are assigned by therapy area, not by availability. They hold a master’s degree or doctorate in life sciences, medicine or pharmacy and have at least five years of experience. Regulatory writers work to the guidance that governs each document.

Team roles

A therapy-area leadCoordinates the programme across documents and is assigned before work starts
Regulatory medical writersICH-structured documents, with the guidance edition recorded
StatisticiansEstimands, statistical analysis plans and traceable outputs
Information specialistsReproducible searches for the literature-based components
Independent reviewersA second qualified reviewer who did not write the draft
Health economistsEconomic evidence for payers, prepared alongside the clinical documents

Sample work

Sample deliverables

Samples are published with sponsor agreement and redacted where requested.

Benefits

Benefits of a therapy-area lead for cardiovascular programmes

How matching writers to the therapy area supports your programme.

What you get

Correct reporting guidelineThe reporting guideline and extension are confirmed during the scoping read
Consistent documentsThe clinical overview, study report and manuscripts present consistent data and conclusions
Known review issuesA lead familiar with the area identifies questions reviewers are likely to raise
Early payer planningPayer evidence needs are identified before the dossier is written
Unlimited revisions within the agreed scopeWithin the agreed scope, without a per-round charge
You are the sponsorNamed throughout; we do not offer ghost authorship

Packages

Quotes based on programme scope, not page count

Documents of the same length can involve very different work, so we do not price by word count. The free scoping read gives you a programme quote you can use for budgeting.

First

Scoping read

A free written assessment of what the programme needs, within two business days.

Then

A written scope

Documents, standards, named team and timeline, agreed before work starts.

Quoted

Per programme

One price for the agreed scope, with revisions within the agreed scope included rather than billed per round.

Cardiovascular FAQs

Common questions about cardiovascular projects

Yes. We assign a lead who has worked in cardiovascular disease and is familiar with the interpretation of composite endpoints. They can identify likely reviewer questions before drafting begins. If no one on our panel is a suitable match, we will tell you and decline the work.

It depends on your study design rather than the indication. In cardiovascular disease, this is typically: CONSORT 2025 with the non-inferiority and cluster extensions; ICH E9(R1) for estimands; device pathway documentation where hardware is involved. We confirm the correct guideline during the free scoping read, because revising a completed report to a different guideline is much harder.

Composite results that are positive for hospitalisation but not for mortality need a full component breakdown, which reviewers routinely request. We check for this on every cardiovascular programme before submission so it can be corrected early.

Non-inferiority margins should be justified on clinical grounds. Reviewers challenge margins chosen mainly for feasibility. We flag this during the scoping read, while the evidence plan can still be adjusted.

Yes. A designated project lead coordinates the protocol, statistical analysis plan, clinical study report and publications to keep data interpretation and messaging consistent. Health-authority questions are answered by the writer of the document concerned.

We do not operate your pharmacovigilance system. We write the risk management plan and periodic reports, but case processing and reporting to authorities remain within your own PV system under your qualified person. We do not conduct trials, audit or certify GCP or GMP compliance, or claim authorship of your research. You remain the sponsor throughout.

Related Therapy Areas

Therapy areas often linked to cardiovascular programmes

Where a programme spans two therapy areas, we assign a lead for each area.

Other therapy areas

Oncology & haematologyOncology and haematology writing, including RECIST and iRECIST reporting and survival analysis.
Endocrinology & diabetesGlycaemic trials, cardiovascular outcome trials and metabolic cohort studies.
NeurologyImaging endpoints, disability scales and longitudinal cohort studies.
Psychiatry & mental healthRating-scale validation, blinding and outcome reporting in mental health trials.
Immunology & inflammationBiologic comparability, immunogenicity reporting and mechanism-of-action writing.
All sixteen areasThe full register of therapy areas
IndustriesTwelve industry sectors and their regulatory requirements

Discuss your cardiovascular project requirements

Tell us the indication and your timeline. The scoping read is free and takes two business days. You receive a written assessment of what the programme needs and who would lead it.

Get a free quote

Regulations

Check your project against this rule

  1. 1Your work
  2. 2Your details
  3. 3Send
What do you need?

Material you send is held under signed confidentiality, with access limited to the assigned team and encrypted transfer. It is not used to train anything and is not passed to third-party tools. Ask for the agreement before you send anything you would rather cover first.