Free scoping read. A written assessment of your manuscript in two business days, at no cost.

Start one

Home›Who we help›Journals, publishers & societies

Editorial and Publishing Services

For Journals, Publishers & Societies

Pubrica provides journals, publishers and societies with editorial office operations, integrity case handling, statistical and search-strategy review, copy editing and production QA, accessibility audit and remediation, and indexing support. These obligations apply equally to a society journal run by part-time editors and to one with a professional editorial office. We work inside your own submission system as additional capacity, and the journal remains under your control.

  • Inside your own system — we work in your submission platform under your editorial policies, and the journal stays yours
  • Editorial operations at volume: peer review management, reviewer identification, author correspondence and reviewer follow-up
  • Accessibility audit and remediation, including the VPAT or accessibility conformance report that institutional buyers now ask for
  • Specialist checks general reviewers cannot make: statistical review, PRESS peer review of search strategies, reference validation
  • Integrity cases handled to COPE flowcharts, which arrive without warning and require experienced handling
Services for publishers Outside our scope

Editorial office operationsIncluded

Copy editing and production QAIncluded

Accessibility audit and remediationIncluded

Statistical and search peer reviewIncluded

Making editorial decisionsRemains with your editors

Submission → reviewed → decided → produced → accessible

Included in every publisher engagement
  • Inside your own system
  • Under your editorial policies
  • Decisions stay with your editors
  • COPE flowcharts on integrity cases
  • Conformance evidenced, not claimed
Quoted on volumePer article or retained
COPE flowchartsOn every integrity case
WCAG 2.2 and EN 301 549Audited and remediated
ISO 9001:2015Quality management certified · cert. H3CR9TCU20251212INDQM10N

Our Services

Editorial, Integrity, Review and Accessibility Services

We provide editorial capacity and specialist checks, both of which are difficult for smaller journals to staff.

Editorial office operations · retained or per article Peer review management, reviewer identification and follow-up, author correspondence, and the administrative work that determines your time to first decision. Your editors still decide.

Editorial control stays with youWe work in your system under your policies. We do not offer arrangements in which the journal stops being yours.

Integrity and corrections · quoted Allegations handled to the appropriate COPE flowchart, including image duplication, authorship disputes, undisclosed conflicts and suspected paper mill activity, with correspondence drafted and the notice written correctly.

Experienced case handlingIntegrity cases are procedurally demanding and rare enough that small offices seldom build the experience. Choosing the wrong notice type is itself an error that must be corrected.

Specialist review · quoted Specialist checks that general peer reviewers rarely make: statistical review, PRESS peer review of search strategies on systematic review submissions, and reference validation.

Search strategy reviewSearch strategies are rarely peer reviewed in systematic review submissions, and a single precedence error can remove eligible studies without notice.

Accessibility and production · quoted Audit against WCAG 2.2, Section 508 and EN 301 549, then the remediation — PDF, EPUB, MathML equations, scientific alt text — and the VPAT or ACR institutional buyers ask for.

Procurement requirementsLibrary and institutional purchasers increasingly require a conformance report. A claim of compliance without one is not evidence.

Samples are illustrative and anonymised. Hover any one of them to play it again.

Compliance and Standards

Publishing Ethics and Accessibility Standards

We apply publishing ethics standards and the accessibility requirements that now apply to digital content.

COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics)

What may be claimed about a paper, and how journals handle authorship, disclosure and correction when something is wrong.

ICMJE Recommendations (authorship and disclosure)

Four authorship criteria, the declarations journals require, and the rule that editing and writing support is acknowledged rather than credited as authorship.

2.2 / 508

Accessibility conformance (and EN 301 549)

The success criteria content is audited against, the US federal procurement standard, and the European harmonised standard that underpins the accessibility requirements now applying to digital products.

ISO9001:2015

Quality management (cert. H3CR9TCU20251212INDQM10N)

Our certified quality system governs how work is run, recorded and released.

How It Works

How a Publisher Engagement Works

We work inside your system and under your policies, and your editors make the decisions.

Step one

Your system and policies

We obtain access to your submission platform, read your editorial policies, and agree the boundary between our work and your editors’ decisions.

Step two

Triage and routing

Submissions are triaged, specialist checks are routed where they add value, and other submissions proceed without waiting for an editor.

Step three

Editorial and production work

Editorial operations, copy editing, specialist review or remediation, carried out to your standards and style.

Step four

Reporting

We report time to decision, queue position and conformance status in a format your board can review.

FAQs

Questions from Journals, Publishers and Societies

If your question is not answered here, ask an expert — no quote is required.

No. We work in your system under your policies, and editorial decisions stay with your editors. We handle process, correspondence and specialist checks.

We do not offer arrangements that remove editorial decisions from your editors.

Yes, often more so than for a large journal. Retained capacity gives you access to roles a small journal cannot fund on its own, such as an integrity specialist, a statistical reviewer and accessibility expertise.

Retained arrangements can be small. Without them, most societies cannot do this work at all.

Yes. DOAJ, Scopus and Web of Science applications are documentation exercises with specific, checkable criteria, and most rejections are for things that could have been fixed first.

We assess readiness before you apply, because a rejection carries a waiting period.

At minimum, content that meets WCAG 2.2 at the level your market expects, and evidence of it. Institutional purchasers increasingly ask for a VPAT or accessibility conformance report.

A claim of compliance is not a conformance report, and procurement teams treat them differently.

Related services

Related Audiences and Services

Services for clients with related publishing and production needs.

Request a Free Editorial Capacity Assessment

Tell us your queue length and journal size. For most society journals, the assessment identifies at least one specialist check the journal cannot staff, which is usually where our support adds most value.

Get a free quote

Regulations

Check your project against this rule

  1. 1Your work
  2. 2Your details
  3. 3Send
What do you need?

Material you send is held under signed confidentiality, with access limited to the assigned team and encrypted transfer. It is not used to train anything and is not passed to third-party tools. Ask for the agreement before you send anything you would rather cover first.