Free scoping read. A written assessment of your manuscript in two business days, at no cost.

Start one

Home›Services›Editorial & journal services›Proof-stage proofreading

Publisher Production Services

Proof-Stage Proofreading

Pubrica’s proof-stage proofreading service checks typeset proofs for journals and publishers before publication. Our proofreaders read the typeset proof against the approved manuscript and identify errors introduced during composition, including transposed figure panels, dropped references, changed units, bad breaks and widow lines. This differs from manuscript proofreading, which polishes an author’s text before submission. You receive marked proofs in your workflow, triaged author queries and a summary of what typesetting introduced.

  • Comparison with the approved manuscript: we identify what changed between the manuscript and the proof rather than looking for possible improvements
  • Composition errors caught: transposed panels, dropped or duplicated lines, altered special characters and units, broken cross-references
  • Typography checked: bad breaks, widows and orphans, running heads, hyphenation and spacing faults
  • Author queries reviewed: queries that need the author are passed on, and the rest are resolved from the manuscript
  • Marked in your workflow: we use PDF annotation, an online proofing system or a marked-up file, as your production team prefers
What proof-stage proofreading covers And what it does not

Proof read against approved manuscriptIncluded

Composition and typography errorsIncluded

Author query reviewIncluded

Marked in your proofing workflowIncluded

Rewriting or improving the textNot done at proof stage

Proof → compared → marked → queried → corrected

Every proof
  • Comparison with the approved manuscript
  • Composition errors caught
  • Typography checked
  • Author queries triaged
  • Marked in your workflow
Quoted per proofOn page count and figure and table density
By issueJournals quoted per issue or per volume
To your house styleAnd your proofing workflow
ISO 9001:2015Quality management certified · cert. H3CR9TCU20251212INDQM10N

Service Scope

Four Components of Every Proof-Stage Proofreading Project

Each project compares one proof with its approved manuscript and records every difference between them.

Comparison against the approved manuscript The proof read against the approved manuscript. Anything that differs is either an intentional typesetting decision or an error, and both need noting.

From the comparisonProof approved, no changes.Figure 3 panels B and C transposed; one reference dropped between 14 and 15; micrograms rendered as milligrams in Table 2; four author queries unanswered. All introduced after approval.

Composition error checks We check for special characters and units altered in conversion, lines dropped or duplicated at page breaks, cross-references broken by repagination and panels reordered in assembly.

From the checklistThese are not author errors, and a fresh proofread rarely catches them because they read as plausible. A comparison with the manuscript identifies them.

Typography and layout checks We check bad breaks, widows and orphans, running heads, loose or tight lines, hyphenation faults and table alignment.

From the typography passThese issues do not change the meaning, but they affect how carefully produced the publication appears to readers.

Author queries triaged We identify which queries need the author, which can be answered from the manuscript and which can be withdrawn.

From the query reviewSending an author fourteen queries when only four need an answer slows proof rounds. Query triage protects the production schedule.

Samples are illustrative and anonymised. Hover any one of them to play it again.

Compliance and Standards

Proof-Stage Proofreading Standards and Guidelines

Where the publisher has a house style and proofing convention, these take precedence.

STYLEand marks

House style and proof marks (your conventions)

Style, spelling, reference format and the marking convention used — BSI marks, PDF annotation or an online proofing system.

TYPOstandards

Typographic conventions (breaks, widows, spacing)

What counts as an acceptable break, how running heads behave and how tables and figures are placed relative to their first citation.

ICMJE Recommendations (authorship and declarations)

Authorship criteria, contributor roles, conflict of interest, funding and data statements — the declarations an article is expected to carry.

ISO9001:2015

Quality management (cert. H3CR9TCU20251212INDQM10N)

How the work is briefed, performed, recorded and released at volume.

Responsible Use of AI

Our Approach to AI Use and Disclosure

AI tools support specific, checkable tasks. Editorial judgement, final wording and sign-off remain with Pubrica subject specialists.

What we use it forFinding and grouping issues at scale, such as inconsistent terminology, reference formatting and style deviations, which a specialist then reviews and resolves.
What we do not use it forWriting or rewriting scientific content, making editorial, ethical or integrity decisions, assessing research quality, or signing off any deliverable.
What goes in your declarationYour declaration should name the tool, the stage at which it was used and the human oversight applied. Journals, funders, regulators and the ICMJE January 2026 update now expect this, and an undeclared tool found later is treated as an integrity matter.

Why we do not publish our own AI accuracy figures

Accuracy figures for AI tools are usually reported by the companies that sell them.

Pubrica therefore does not quote its own accuracy figures, as they would carry the same conflict of interest. Instead, we tell you which tool was used on your project, at which stage, and what a specialist changed afterwards.

Our Process

How Our Proof-Stage Proofreading Process Works

We complete the comparison read before the typography check, because the reverse order tends to miss the most significant errors.

Step one

Project set-up

We collect the approved manuscript, the proof, the house style and the marking convention, along with any known typesetting issues to watch for.

Step two

Comparison read

We read the proof against the manuscript and record every difference as either intentional or an error.

Step three

Typography and layout

We check breaks, widows, running heads, spacing, table alignment and the placement of figures relative to their first citation.

Step four

Query triage and mark-up

We triage author queries, mark all corrections in your workflow and summarise the errors introduced during typesetting.

Our Experts

Your Proof-Stage Proofreading Team

Your project is handled by a named team that stays with it from scoping to delivery. Your project coordinator introduces each team member by name before work begins.

Subject matter expertClinical or scientific expert matched to your topic

Reviews the scientific content for accuracy and confirms that each conclusion is supported by the evidence. Matched to your field rather than allocated from a rota.

OwnsScientific accuracy and interpretation
Reads againstThe journal's instructions and reporting guideline
FieldMatched to your topic
Senior editorEdits for language, structure and consistency

Edits for clarity, grammar, structure and consistency while preserving the author voice and scientific meaning.

OwnsLanguage, structure and consistency
Reads againstThe journal style and a project style sheet
OutputTracked-changes manuscript
Second reviewerIndependent quality check before delivery

Checks the finished work independently against the agreed scope and the applicable checklist. Findings are logged and resolved before delivery.

OwnsIndependent quality control
Reads againstThe agreed scope and checklist
Signed off byProject lead
Project coordinatorYour single point of contact

Manages the timeline, keeps you informed at each stage and coordinates the team so that questions are answered and deadlines are met.

OwnsTimeline and communication
Reads againstYour brief and deadline
OutputDelivery and follow-up

Packages

Proof-Stage Proofreading Packages

Cost depends on page count and on the density of figures and tables, which take the most time.

Proof

Single proof

Books, articles and reports at proof stage

Quoted per projectOn page count and density

Delivery By scope

  • ✓Comparison with the approved manuscript
  • ✓Composition errors identified
  • ✓Typography and layout checked
  • ✓Author queries triaged
  • ✓Marked in your proofing workflow
  • ✓Summary of what typesetting introduced

The summary is useful because recurring typesetting errors usually share a single cause.

Service Scope Request a quote
Issue

Issue or list

Journals and publishers at volume

Quoted per projectOn volume and cadence

Delivery By arrangement

  • ✓Proofs read to one method across the issue
  • ✓Consistent house style applied
  • ✓Pattern summary across the batch
  • ✓Recurring composition errors fed back to production
  • ✓Worked to your production schedule

Reporting recurring errors to the typesetter is often more valuable than the individual corrections.

Service Scope Request a quote

Send one proof and its approved manuscript, and we will read twenty pages free of charge and report the errors introduced during composition.

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions About Proof-Stage Proofreading

If your question is not answered here, ask an expert — no quote required.

They take place at different stages and serve different clients. Manuscript proofreading polishes an author’s text before submission, covering spelling, grammar and consistency.

Proof-stage proofreading reads a typeset proof against an approved manuscript to find what composition changed. It is a comparison, not an improvement pass, and the customer is usually a publisher rather than an author.

No. At proof stage, changes cost money and risk introducing new errors, and the text has already been approved by the author and the editor.

Where something is genuinely wrong rather than merely improvable, we raise a query. Avoiding rewriting at proof stage is part of the service.

Special characters and units altered in conversion, figure panels transposed during assembly, dropped or duplicated lines at page breaks, and cross-references broken by repagination.

These errors read as plausible, so a fresh proofread often misses them, whereas a comparison with the manuscript identifies them.

Yes — PDF annotation, an online proofing platform or a marked-up file, in whatever convention your production team uses.

We are independent of your typesetter, so the composition is checked by someone other than the person who produced it.

Related services

Related Academic Editorial Services

Proof stage is the last point at which corrections are inexpensive. These services support the same stage of production.

Request a Free Proof-Stage Proofreading Sample

We will read twenty pages free and tell you what composition introduced. The sample report separates errors introduced during typesetting from changes made by the author.

Get a free quote

Regulations

Check your project against this rule

  1. 1Your work
  2. 2Your details
  3. 3Send
What do you need?

Material you send is held under signed confidentiality, with access limited to the assigned team and encrypted transfer. It is not used to train anything and is not passed to third-party tools. Ask for the agreement before you send anything you would rather cover first.