Should a rejected manuscript be sent to another journal immediately?

That is the common response and usually the expensive one. If reviewers identified a real problem, the next journal’s reviewers are drawn from the same community and will identify it too. A desk rejection on scope is different — there the paper may genuinely need retargeting rather than revision, and moving quickly is right.

When is an appeal worth making?

When there is a factual error in the assessment, or a reviewer clearly misread something material. Not when you disagree with a judgement. A failed appeal costs six to eight weeks and rarely helps. We will tell you which situation you are in.

Should we accept a transfer offer?

Sometimes. A transfer carries the reviews across and can be much faster, which is valuable when the science is sound and the fit was wrong. It is a downgrade when the destination journal is materially weaker than where the paper could reach with revision. That is a judgement worth making deliberately rather than accepting by default.

Home›Services›Publication support›Resubmission support

Manuscript Resubmission Services

Manuscript Resubmission Support

Q: Do we have to disclose the previous rejection?

Not usually, and you should never conceal a concurrent submission — that is a different and serious matter. Where a transfer is involved the reviews travel with it by design. Where you are submitting fresh, the new journal assesses it on its own terms.

Pubrica’s resubmission support is for authors whose manuscript has been rejected and who need to decide on the next step. Our subject matter experts analyse the decision letter, advise whether to appeal, accept a transfer offer or resubmit elsewhere, and rework and reformat the paper for the next journal with a new cover letter. A desk rejection and a rejection after review call for different responses, and resubmitting an unchanged paper immediately is rarely the most effective option.

Analysis of the decision: desk rejection, rejection after review, rejection with encouragement to resubmit and transfer offers are four different situations
Objective advice on appeals, which are occasionally justified but can cost months when they are not
Use of the reviewer comments, even on a rejection, because the next journal’s reviewers will find the same problems
Reworked and reformatted for the next target, because a manuscript still in the previous journal’s format shows that it was rejected elsewhere
A new cover letter, because editors usually notice a reused cover letter

Get a free quote Service Scope

What resubmission support covers Included services and exclusions

Rejection analysisIncluded

Appeal, transfer or resubmit adviceIncluded

Manuscript reworked against commentsIncluded

Reformatted for the next journalIncluded

Reversing the original decisionThe editor’s

Rejection → read → decided → reworked → resubmitted

Every rejection

Decision letter analysed
Appeal advised only where justified
Reviewer comments acted on
Reformatted for the new target
New cover letter written

Quoted per paperOn the extent of rework needed

By decision typeDesk reject, post-review reject, transfer offer

COPE and ICMJEIncluding disclosure of prior submission where expected

ISO 9001:2015Quality management certified · cert. H3CR9TCU20251212INDQM10N

Deliverables

Four Components of Resubmission Support

Each project starts with a careful reading of the decision letter, which determines the appropriate next step.

Analysis of the decision letter A desk rejection usually concerns scope or presentation, whereas a rejection after review concerns the science. “Reject, but we would consider a new submission” is a conditional invitation.

Analysis example~~The paper was rejected, so we will send it to another journal.~~Desk rejection on scope, not quality — the journal does not publish this study type. The science was never assessed, so the rework is targeting, not revision.

Advice on whether to appeal Appeals are worth making where there is a factual error in the assessment or a reviewer plainly misunderstood something. They are not worth making because you disagree.

Recommendation exampleA failed appeal costs six to eight weeks and rarely improves your position. We will advise when an appeal is justified, which is not often.

Using reviewer comments after rejection The next journal’s reviewers are drawn from the same community and will identify the same problems, so these comments are worth acting on.

Rework exampleThe most common costly mistake is resubmitting unchanged within a week, which often leads to the same objections three months later from a different journal.

Retargeting and reformatting A new journal requires a new case for fit, a new format and a new cover letter, rather than the same submission with a different address.

Resubmission exampleEditors quickly recognise a manuscript formatted for another journal, and this can affect their reading before they assess the science.

Samples are illustrative and anonymised. Hover over a sample to replay it.

Compliance and Standards

COPE, ICMJE, Publisher Transfer Policies and ISO 9001:2015

The new journal’s instructions take precedence. The standards below govern conduct around a resubmission.

COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics)

A derived asset may not claim more than the paper supports, and an image may not misrepresent what was observed.

ICMJE Recommendations (authorship and declarations)

Authorship criteria, declarations and the conventions editors expect in correspondence and submission material.

CASCand appeals

Transfer and appeal processes (publisher cascade, appeal windows)

Many publishers offer transfer to a sister journal with the reviews carried across. This can be faster, but it is sometimes a step down that is worth declining.

ISO9001:2015

Quality management (cert. H3CR9TCU20251212INDQM10N)

Our quality management system governs how work is briefed, produced, reviewed and released.

Responsible Use of AI

Our Approach to AI Use and Disclosure

Journals now ask authors to declare any AI tools used in preparing a manuscript. Pubrica treats this declaration as part of the deliverable and tells you exactly what was used on your manuscript, so that you can complete it accurately.

How we use AI toolsWe use automated tools for similarity screening, for consistency of terms, figures and cross-references, for checking references against the records they cite, and for reformatting to a journal template.

What we do not use AI forWe do not use AI to write or strengthen your argument or to draft rebuttal reasoning. We also do not provide AI-detection scores, because no tool produces them reliably and false positives disproportionately affect authors writing in English as an additional language.

What your AI declaration includesThe declaration states the tool, the stage at which it was used and the human oversight applied. Journals, funders, regulators and the ICMJE January 2026 update now expect this, and an undeclared tool discovered later is treated as an integrity matter.

Why We Do Not Publish AI Accuracy Figures

Accuracy figures for AI tools are usually reported by the companies that sell them.

Pubrica therefore quotes no self-generated accuracy figure, as it would carry the same conflict of interest. Instead, we tell you which tool was used on your project, at which stage, and what a human editor changed afterwards.

Get a free quote

How It Works

How Our Resubmission Support Process Works

We start by analysing the decision, because resubmitting immediately is often the most costly option.

Step one

Read the decision

We identify the type of rejection, what the editor said and what any reviewers identified.

Step two

Decide the route

We advise on whether to appeal, accept a transfer offer or resubmit elsewhere, with an objective assessment of each option.

Step three

Rework

We address the substantive problems, whether or not the new journal would have identified them, and reformat the manuscript for the new target.

Step four

Resubmit

We prepare a new cover letter and case for fit, update the declarations and disclose prior submission where expected.

Our experts

Your Resubmission Support Team

The same named team works on your project from scoping to delivery, and your project coordinator introduces each member before work begins.

Subject matter expertClinical or scientific expert matched to your topic

Reviews the scientific content for accuracy and confirms that each conclusion is supported by the evidence. The expert is matched to your field.

OwnsScientific accuracy and interpretation

Reads againstThe journal's instructions and reporting guideline

FieldMatched to your topic

Senior editorEdits for language, structure and consistency

Edits for clarity, grammar, structure and consistency while preserving the author voice and scientific meaning.

OwnsLanguage, structure and consistency

Reads againstThe journal style and a project style sheet

OutputTracked-changes manuscript

Second reviewerIndependent quality check before delivery

Checks the finished work independently against the agreed scope and the applicable checklist. Findings are logged and resolved before delivery.

OwnsIndependent quality control

Reads againstThe agreed scope and checklist

Signed off byProject lead

Project coordinatorYour single point of contact

Manages the timeline, keeps you informed at each stage and coordinates the team so that questions are answered and deadlines are met.

OwnsTimeline and communication

Reads againstYour brief and deadline

OutputDelivery and follow-up

Packages

Resubmission Support Packages

The cost depends on how much rework the comments require.

Analysis

Rejection analysis

Deciding what to do next

Quoted per projectOn decision complexity

Delivery By scope

✓Decision letter and reviewer comments read
✓Explanation of what the rejection means
✓Appeal, transfer or resubmit recommended
✓Target journal shortlist where resubmitting
✓Rework scope estimated

A quick, low-cost assessment that helps you avoid resubmitting an unchanged manuscript.

Deliverables Request a quote

Full

Analysis and rework

Papers going to a new journal

Quoted per projectOn rework extent

Delivery By scope

✓Everything in the analysis
✓Substantive comments addressed
✓Manuscript reformatted for the new target
✓New cover letter with a new fit argument
✓Declarations refreshed
✓Submission handled where you want it

Where reviewers identified a real problem, addressing it now costs less than facing it again at the next journal.

Deliverables Request a quote

Send the decision letter and we will tell you free of charge what type of rejection it is. Desk rejection and rejection after review call for different responses, and the letter usually indicates which applies.

FAQs

Resubmission Support FAQs

If your question is not answered here, please ask an expert. No quote is required.

Immediate resubmission is common but usually costly. If reviewers identified a real problem, the next journal’s reviewers, drawn from the same community, are likely to identify it too.

A desk rejection on scope is different. In that case the paper may need retargeting rather than revision, and moving quickly is appropriate.

An appeal is justified when there is a factual error in the assessment or a reviewer clearly misread something material, but not when you disagree with a judgement.

A failed appeal costs six to eight weeks and rarely helps. We will tell you which situation applies.

In some cases. A transfer carries the reviews across and can be much faster, which is valuable when the science is sound but the journal fit was wrong.

A transfer is a step down when the destination journal is materially weaker than journals the paper could reach with revision. This decision should be made deliberately rather than by default.

Usually not, but you should never conceal a concurrent submission, which is a separate and serious matter.

Where a transfer is involved the reviews travel with it by design. Where you are submitting fresh, the new journal assesses it on its own terms.

Related services

Related Publication Support Services

After a rejection, the submission process usually restarts with another journal.

1JOURNAL SELECTIONretargeting

Journal selection$130, with 3 to 5 recommendations. Cover letterA new cover letter with a new case for fit.

2MANUSCRIPT REWORKbefore resubmitting

Manuscript editingA full copyedit with journal formatting. Statistical reviewFor manuscripts with methodological issues.

3REVISION DECISIONSrather than rejections

Response to reviewersPoint-by-point rebuttal letters. Pre-submission peer reviewA simulated peer review before resubmission.

Request a Free Assessment of Your Rejection Decision

Desk rejection and rejection after review call for different responses, and the decision letter usually indicates which applies.

Get a free quote Contact us