Free scoping read. A written assessment of your manuscript in two business days, at no cost.

Start one

Home›Services›Digital Health Experience›Living Data Presentation Layers

Evidence presentations updated on a defined cycle

Living Data Presentation Layers

Pubrica builds living data presentation layers for evidence synthesis and HEOR teams, pharmacovigilance and safety teams, guideline developers, systematic review writing teams and publisher-facing teams. Each project delivers a dashboard or document that updates on a defined recurring cycle, a documented update protocol, a version history with citable, dated snapshots, a change log for each update and the data pipeline that connects source data to the presentation layer, following the Cochrane Handbook, Chapter 22 (Living systematic reviews). Our data visualization specialists and biostatistics-literate designers work in-house. A named subject specialist manages your project from brief to delivery, and a second, independent reviewer checks the work before it reaches you.

  • A presentation layer — included in every engagement
  • Documented update protocol — included in every engagement
  • Version history with citable/dated snapshots of each update — included in every engagement
  • Produced to named standards, including the Cochrane Handbook, Chapter 22 (Living systematic reviews)
  • Scoped pricing: a quote provided after a short scoping call
What is included What is not included

A presentation layerIncluded

Documented update protocolIncluded

Version history with citable/dated snapshots of each updateIncluded

Change-log or 'what's new' communication accompanying each updateIncluded

A flat price with no scoping callNot included

Brief → scoping → draft → delivered

Every engagement
  • A presentation layer
  • Documented update protocol
  • Version history with citable/dated snapshots of each update
  • Change-log or 'what's new' communication accompanying each update
  • Underlying data pipeline or workflow connecting source data to the presentation layer
Scoped quoteQuoted after a short scoping call
15–25 business daysFrom brief to final delivery
5 deliverablesListed in full below
ISO 9001:2015Quality management certified · cert. H3CR9TCU20251212INDQM10N

Deliverables

Five Core Living Data Presentation Deliverables

Every item below is produced in-house by Pubrica’s data visualization specialists and biostatistics-literate designers and checked by a second, independent reviewer before delivery.

A presentation layer A presentation layer (dashboard or document) that updates on a defined recurring cycle.
Documented update protocol Documented update protocol (search/refresh frequency, inclusion criteria, approval workflow).
Version history with citable/dated snapshots of each update Version history with citable/dated snapshots of each update.
Change-log or 'what's new' communication accompanying each update Change-log or 'what's new' communication accompanying each update.
Underlying data pipeline or workflow connecting source data to the presentation layer Underlying data pipeline or workflow connecting source data to the presentation layer.

Who We Serve

Five Client Groups We Support with Living Data Presentation

The organizations below commission this service, and each project is planned around the audience who will use the material.

Evidence synthesis and HEOR teams maintaining ongoing literature reviewsA client group that commissions this service directly.
Pharmacovigilance/safety teamsNeeding continuously updated safety signal views
Guideline developers and policymakers relying on current evidence summariesA client group that commissions this service directly.
MedicalWriting teams producing systematic reviews that must stay current between major updates
Journal/publisher-facing teams managing living review submissionsA client group that commissions this service directly.

Compliance and Standards

Living Data Presentation Standards and Guidelines

The regulatory codes, guidelines and quality standards that apply to this service.

CHC2

Cochrane Handbook, Chapter 22 (Living systematic reviews)

Chapter 22 sets the methodological standard for how a continually updated systematic review defines its update frequency, search strategy and change tracking, which a living data presentation layer must mirror in its update pipeline and version history.

ISO9001:2015

Quality management (cert. H3CR9TCU20251212INDQM10N)

Governs how each project is managed, reviewed and documented.

Responsible Use of AI

Our Approach to AI Use in Living Data Presentation

Generative tools are useful for drafting and iteration. They are not used anywhere the output could be mistaken for verified clinical data or a real patient.

What we use it forLayout variations, colour systems, and first-pass drafts that a human then corrects against the brief and the brand or clinical standards that apply.
What we do not use it forGenerating any image, figure or quote presented as real clinical data, a real patient, or a verified result; and nothing goes out without a named reviewer's sign-off.
What we include in your AI declarationThe tool, the stage it was used at, and the human oversight applied — because MLR/PRC reviewers, funders and regulators increasingly expect this stated rather than assumed.

Why we do not publish AI accuracy figures

Accuracy figures for AI design and content tools are usually reported by the vendors that sell them.

For this reason we do not quote an accuracy figure of our own. We tell you which tool was used on your project, at which stage, and what a named reviewer changed afterwards.

Our Process

Living Data Presentation Process: Four Steps with Draft Review

Each project moves from brief and scoping to a reviewed first draft, then to revisions and final delivery.

Step one

Submit Your Brief and Reference Material

Send us what the presentation layer needs to communicate, who will see it and anything that must or must not appear, together with any existing assets, brand guidelines or source material we should work from.

Step two

Initial Scoping Discussion

We confirm the audience, the applicable standards and, for scoped work, the factors that determine the final price, so the quote is agreed before work begins.

Step three

Concept and First Draft

A subject specialist and the production team build the first version against the brief, reviewed internally for accuracy before it reaches you.

Step four

Revisions and Final Delivery

We incorporate your revisions and deliver the files listed on this page, including the working files, so the material can be updated later without starting again.

Request a Free Scoping Assessment for Your Living Data Presentation Project

We confirm the cost, timeline and applicable standards before you commit to anything. The assessment is free and is completed within two business days.

What you provide
The briefThe purpose of the material and its intended audience
Reference materialExisting assets, brand or style guidelines, prior approved versions
The audienceClinician, patient, payer, investor or internal team
ConstraintsAnything that must or must not appear, and the standards that apply
The deadlineYour deadline, including any congress or submission window
Approval routeWho approves the work, and whether MLR/PRC review is part of the process

Our Experts

Your Living Data Presentation Team

The same named team of specialists stays with your project from scoping to delivery.

Subject expertSubject matter expert matched to your topic

Determines which claims the evidence supports. The subject expert is matched to your topic and tells you clearly when the brief asks for something the evidence does not support.

OwnsScope, judgement, interpretation
Reviews againstThe applicable standards for this work
FieldMatched to your topic
Dr. DivyaPhD in Life Science · second reviewer

Reviews the work independently of the first pass and reconciles the two, because most errors in this work are factual rather than errors of reasoning. Disagreements are logged and adjudicated.

OwnsIndependent second read
Reviews againstThe applicable checklist
Adjudicated byA third reviewer
Dr. AntonyProduction and delivery lead

Responsible for file formats, compliance with the destination specification and the handover of working files, so that the delivered files match what you requested.

OwnsProduction and delivery
Reviews againstThe destination's own specification
Second-checked byA second production reviewer
Mr. JohnCompliance and standards reviewer

Confirms that the work meets the standards that apply to it, whether MLR, WCAG, a regulatory guidance or the body that governs the specific deliverable.

OwnsStandards and compliance review
Reviews againstThe standards listed on this page
ToolsThe current published guidance for each

Evidence Base

The Evidence and Expertise Behind Our Living Data Presentation Services

Each point below is sourced from published research or guidance, or owned by a named role on the team. We can direct you to the source or the reviewer on request.

01 Definition of a living systematic reviewA living systematic review is defined as a review that is 'continually updated to incorporate new and relevant information,' in contrast to traditional reviews that may be updated rarely or never.
02 Why static reviews become outdatedCochrane cites the rapid growth of research output as the reason traditional static reviews become outdated quickly, and says living reviews keep findings current for decision-makers including clinicians, guideline developers, policymakers, funders, patients, and publishers.
03 How living reviews are updated and citedIn practice, living reviews rely on recurring evidence searches (often monthly), prompt incorporation of important new studies and regular status updates, and each update receives its own citation and DOI; according to Cochrane, it published its first pilot living systematic reviews in 2017.

Packages

Living Data Presentation Pricing Based on Project Scope

This service is priced after a short scoping call, because the cost depends on the project factors listed below.

Scoped

Living Data Presentation Layers

The final price is set by the project factors listed below.

Scoped quoteAfter a short, free scoping call

Delivery Set at scoping, typically 15–25 business days

  • ✓Update frequency required (e.g., monthly search-and-refresh cycles vs. near-real-time data feeds)
  • ✓Complexity of the underlying data pipeline feeding the presentation layer (manual literature search vs. automated database/API feeds)
  • ✓Version-tracking and citation requirements (e.g., giving each update its own citable version, as Cochrane does with DOIs)
  • ✓Number and type of outputs to keep 'living' (a single dashboard vs. a dashboard plus an accompanying narrative report)
  • ✓Governance/review process needed before each update is published (who approves new data before it goes live)
Get a scoped quote

Quality Assurance

Our Service Commitment and Revision Policy

The revision commitment that applies to every project, with its scope and remedy stated in advance.

The Pubrica revision commitment

Free Revision Where Work Does Not Meet the Agreed Brief or Named Standard

Within the agreed scope, we revise at no extra cost any work that does not match the brief or a standard named on this page.

01

The brief is confirmed before production

Confirming the brief at scoping prevents misunderstandings that would otherwise require rework after delivery.

02

A named reviewer signs off before you see it

The review is made against the standards listed on this page.

03

AI use is disclosed

We tell you which tool was used, at which stage, and what a human reviewer changed afterwards.

04

You receive the working files

The material can be updated later without starting again or paying for the work twice.

Client Stories

“The dashboard made a protocol deviation visible two weeks before it would have surfaced in a monthly report.”
PeberzClinical operations lead, CRO

USA

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions About Living Data Presentation

If your question is not answered here, ask an expert — no quote required.

Pubrica builds living data presentation layers for evidence synthesis and HEOR teams, pharmacovigilance and safety teams, guideline developers, systematic review writing teams and publisher-facing teams. Each project delivers a dashboard or document that updates on a defined recurring cycle, a documented update protocol, a version history with citable, dated snapshots, a change log for each update and the data pipeline that connects source data to the presentation layer, following the Cochrane Handbook, Chapter 22 (Living systematic reviews). Our data visualization specialists and biostatistics-literate designers work in-house. A named subject specialist manages your project from brief to delivery, and a second, independent reviewer checks the work before it reaches you.

The core deliverable is a presentation layer (dashboard or document) that updates on a defined recurring cycle; the full list appears under “Deliverables” on this page.

A living systematic review is defined as a review that is 'continually updated to incorporate new and relevant information,' in contrast to traditional reviews that may be updated rarely or never.

This requirement is documented in published research and regulatory guidance, so our specialists address it as a defined part of every project.

The cost depends on several project-specific factors: Update frequency required (e.g., monthly search-and-refresh cycles vs. near-real-time data feeds); Complexity of the underlying data pipeline feeding the presentation layer (manual literature search vs. automated database/API feeds); Version-tracking and citation requirements (e.g., giving each update its own citable version, as Cochrane does with DOIs); Number and type of outputs to keep 'living' (a single dashboard vs. a dashboard plus an accompanying narrative report).

A single flat price would not reflect these differences, so we agree the price in a short scoping call before you commit to anything.

Evidence synthesis and HEOR teams maintaining ongoing literature reviews

Pharmacovigilance and safety teams commission it for continuously updated safety signal views.

Chapter 22 sets the methodological standard for how a continually updated systematic review defines its update frequency, search strategy and change tracking, which a living data presentation layer must mirror in its update pipeline and version history.

We apply this standard from the start of each project rather than correcting for it after a reviewer raises it.

Request a Free Living Data Presentation Scoping Assessment

Receive a free assessment of cost, timeline and applicable standards within two business days.

Get a free quote

Regulations

Check your project against this rule

  1. 1Your work
  2. 2Your details
  3. 3Send
What do you need?

Material you send is held under signed confidentiality, with access limited to the assigned team and encrypted transfer. It is not used to train anything and is not passed to third-party tools. Ask for the agreement before you send anything you would rather cover first.