Free scoping read. A written assessment of your manuscript in two business days, at no cost.

Start one

Home›Services›Medical communications›Advisory boards

Medical Affairs Services

Advisory Board Materials and Facilitation

Pubrica designs, prepares and facilitates advisory boards for medical affairs teams in life-science companies. A board is held because the company has a genuine scientific question it cannot answer internally, and the meeting time belongs to the advisers. Our medical communications writers define and document the advisory question, prepare the pre-read and agenda, facilitate the meeting and write the output report that records the advice and the actions taken.

  • The advisory question is documented before invitations are sent, which is a compliance requirement and gives qualified advisers a clear reason to attend
  • Agendas give advisers more speaking time than the sponsor, with structured discussion planned in advance
  • Advisers are selected for expertise, not prescribing volume, with the selection rationale recorded
  • Fair market value and disclosure are addressed, since payments are reportable under the Sunshine Act in the US and the EFPIA Disclosure Code in Europe
  • The output report records what changed, because a board whose advice changed nothing cannot be distinguished from a promotional meeting
What advisory board support covers What is included and what is excluded

Advisory question defined and documentedIncluded

Pre-read and agenda built for discussionIncluded

Independent facilitationIncluded

Output report with actionsIncluded

Boards designed to deliver promotional messagesNot offered

Question → advisers → pre-read → discussion → advice acted on

Included in every board
  • Advisory question documented first
  • Advisers selected for expertise
  • Agenda weighted to discussion
  • Payments at fair market value, disclosed
  • Output report showing what changed
Quoted per boardBased on adviser count and format
Sunshine and EFPIAPayments reportable and disclosed
Discussion-led agendasAdvisers speak more than the sponsor
ISO 9001:2015Quality management certified · cert. H3CR9TCU20251212INDQM10N

Deliverables

Four Components of Every Advisory Board

Each board is designed to meet both the compliance test and the usefulness test: a genuine need for advice that the company does not already have.

Advisory question documented before invitations A specific question the company cannot answer internally, recorded with the business need, the number of advisers required and why those advisers.

Example from a board rationaleTo gather expert perspectives on the treatment landscape.We need to understand how nephrologists sequence therapy after first-line failure in patients with eGFR below 30, because our Phase III excluded them and the guideline committee has asked. Eight advisers, chosen for practice in that population.

Agenda designed for discussion Presentations are kept short and limited to framing, most of the time is given to structured discussion, and the pre-read provides the background so that the meeting can focus on advice.

Example from an agenda designThe balance between presentation and discussion is visible to everyone present. An agenda that is two-thirds slides signals to advisers what kind of meeting they are attending, and they respond accordingly.

Adviser selection based on expertise Advisers are chosen for the specific expertise the question requires, with the rationale documented and prescribing data explicitly excluded as a criterion.

Example from a selection recordSelection influenced by commercial value is one of the red flags named in the OIG Special Fraud Alert on speaker programs, and the same principle applies to advisory boards.

Output report showing the advice received A report recording what the advisers said, including where they disagreed with the sponsor, and what the company changed as a result.

Example from an output reportA board whose advice changed nothing is difficult to distinguish, afterwards, from a meeting held for another purpose. The record of what changed is the evidence that the advice was genuine.

The samples shown are illustrative and anonymised. Hover over a sample to replay it.

Compliance and Standards

Advisory Board Standards: PhRMA Code, GDPR and GPP 2022

Advisory board rules focus on intent, and intent is shown by how the meeting was designed.

Code 2022

PhRMA Code (and the OIG speaker program alert)

The Code revisions effective January 2022 responded directly to the OIG Special Fraud Alert of November 2020. The alert’s suspect characteristics, including minimal educational content, alcohol, unsuitable venues, repeat attendance, sales-influenced speaker selection and compensation above fair market value, define the boundary.

EU2016/679

Data protection (and the UK GDPR)

Profiling named clinicians means processing personal data about identifiable people who have not volunteered it. A lawful basis and a transparency position are required, and both are often missing from mapping proposals.

GPP 2022 (good publication practice)

The 2022 update replaces GPP3. It covers company-sponsored research, including translational, biomarker and real-world studies, and extends to preprints, plain language summaries and social media. Professional medical writing support is legitimate, provided it is disclosed.

ISO9001:2015

Quality management (cert. H3CR9TCU20251212INDQM10N)

Our certified quality system governs how work is run, recorded and released.

Responsible Use of AI

Our Approach to AI Use in Advisory Board Work

Medical affairs work must distinguish scientific exchange from promotion, a boundary that regulators monitor. That judgement depends on context, jurisdiction and the individuals involved, so it is always made by our specialists rather than by an AI tool.

How We Use AI ToolsWe use AI tools to find published evidence and previously approved material, check terminology for consistency across a plan or a set, summarise a body of literature for a specialist to review, and draft templated sections that a specialist then verifies.
Where We Do Not Use AIWe do not use AI to decide what is scientific exchange and what is promotion, to make authorship or contributorship judgements, to issue responses to healthcare professionals as drafted, or to profile named individuals. Pubrica does not use prescribing data for mapping, and the lawful basis for every data source is documented before work begins.
What Your AI Declaration Should IncludeYour declaration should name the tool, the stage at which it was used and the human oversight applied. Journals, funders, regulators and the ICMJE January 2026 update now expect this, and an undeclared tool found later is treated as an integrity matter.

Why We Do Not Publish AI Accuracy Figures

Accuracy figures for AI tools are usually reported by the companies that sell them.

Pubrica therefore does not quote a self-generated accuracy figure, because it would carry the same conflict of interest. Instead, we tell you which tool was used on your project, at which stage, and what a specialist changed afterwards.

Our Process

How Our Advisory Board Process Works

We define the advisory question first. A board convened without a defined question tends to find one on the day, and it is usually a promotional message.

Step one

Question and rationale

We define and document the advisory need and set adviser numbers and selection criteria against it.

Step two

Advisers and logistics

We select advisers on expertise and record the rationale, contract at fair market value and identify the disclosure obligations in each market.

Step three

Pre-read and agenda

We prepare a pre-read that provides the background, so the meeting does not have to, and an agenda weighted to structured discussion.

Step four

Facilitation and reporting

We facilitate the meeting independently, then deliver an output report recording the advice, the points of disagreement and the resulting actions.

Our Experts

Your Advisory Board Team

A named team of subject specialists stays with your project from scoping to delivery. Your project coordinator introduces each team member by name before work begins.

Subject matter expertClinical or scientific expert matched to your topic

Reviews the scientific content for accuracy and confirms that each conclusion is supported by the evidence. Each expert is matched to your field.

Responsible forScientific accuracy and interpretation
Reviews againstThe source evidence and current literature
FieldMatched to your topic
Medical writerDrafts content to the applicable code and guidance

Writes the content against the brief and the applicable code of practice, with every claim traceable to its reference.

Responsible forDrafting and source traceability
Reviews againstGPP, ICMJE and the applicable code of practice
OutputReference-annotated content
Medical reviewerScientific and compliance review before delivery

Reviews the content for scientific accuracy, fair balance and compliance with the applicable code before it reaches your internal review.

Responsible forScientific and compliance review
Reviews againstSource data and the applicable code
Signed off byProject lead
Project coordinatorYour single point of contact

Manages the timeline, keeps you informed at each stage and coordinates the team so that questions are answered and deadlines are met.

Responsible forTimeline and communication
Reviews againstYour brief and deadline
OutputDelivery and follow-up

Packages

Advisory Board Packages

Costs depend on the number of advisers, the format and whether facilitation is included.

Content

Materials only

For boards you facilitate yourself

Quoted per projectBased on adviser count and agenda length

Delivery Agreed at scoping

  • ✓Advisory question documented
  • ✓Pre-read pack prepared
  • ✓Agenda weighted to discussion
  • ✓Discussion guides and stimulus material
  • ✓Output report template
  • ✓Chair briefing

The pre-read provides the background that makes discussion possible. Without it, the first hour of the meeting is spent on background.

Deliverables Request a quote
Full

Design and facilitation

End-to-end support

Quoted per projectBased on advisers, format and duration

Delivery Agreed at scoping

  • ✓Everything in Materials only
  • ✓Independent facilitation
  • ✓Breakout design where useful
  • ✓Live recording of advice and disagreement
  • ✓Output report with actions
  • ✓Follow-up with advisers

An independent facilitator encourages advisers to speak openly, particularly where the advice is unwelcome.

Deliverables Request a quote
Programme

Board programme

Several boards across markets

Quoted per projectBased on board count and markets

Delivery Agreed at scoping

  • ✓Consistent question across markets
  • ✓Local adaptation where needed
  • ✓Comparable output across boards
  • ✓Themes synthesised across the programme
  • ✓Disclosure managed per market
  • ✓Input to the medical plan

A programme is valuable because its boards can be compared. Boards run to different questions cannot be synthesised afterwards.

Deliverables Request a quote

Send your draft agenda and we will assess the balance between discussion and presentation at no cost. Advisers notice this balance first, and reviewers check it.

FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions About Advisory Boards

If your question is not answered here, please ask an expert. No quote is required.

A board is compliant when there is a genuine need for advice that the company cannot meet internally, advisers are selected for expertise, numbers are proportionate to the question, compensation is at fair market value and the process is documented.

The OIG Special Fraud Alert on speaker programs lists suspect characteristics that apply by analogy: sales-influenced selection, compensation above fair market value, minimal content, and unsuitable venues.

There is no fixed ratio, but if presentation dominates the agenda, the meeting is not gathering advice and the advisers will recognise this.

We recommend a short framing presentation, a pre-read that carries the detail, and most of the time given to structured discussion.

Yes. Payments to US physicians are reportable under the Sunshine Act and appear in Open Payments. In Europe the EFPIA Disclosure Code applies, with national codes on top.

Disclosure is a documentation obligation as well as a compliance one, and it is much easier to handle at contracting than to reconstruct later.

It should be recorded. An output report that contains only the advice the company agreed with is the version that is hardest to defend later.

Disagreement is often the most valuable output, and the record that it was heard is part of what makes the board defensible.

Related Services

Related Medical Affairs Services

Advisory boards are one way of obtaining expert input. These related services provide others.

Request a Free Review of Your Advisory Board Agenda

The agenda is the first thing advisers notice and the first thing reviewers check after the meeting.

Get a free quote

Regulations

Check your project against this rule

  1. 1Your work
  2. 2Your details
  3. 3Send
What do you need?

Material you send is held under signed confidentiality, with access limited to the assigned team and encrypted transfer. It is not used to train anything and is not passed to third-party tools. Ask for the agreement before you send anything you would rather cover first.