Free scoping read. A written assessment of your manuscript in two business days, at no cost.

Start one

Home›Services›Digital Health Experience›De-Biasing & Inclusive Representation Design

Representation Audits of Patient-Facing Imagery

De-Biasing & Inclusive Representation Design

Pubrica audits patient-facing imagery and content against a representation rubric and redesigns the assets the audit flags. We work with pharma and medtech communications teams, hospital systems and health plans, medical device and digital health companies and public health organizations. Our medical illustrators, 3D animators and UX/UI designers deliver a scored audit report, a prioritized remediation list, a benchmark against your patient demographic data, redesigned or re-sourced assets and updated imagery guidelines, with reference to FDA pulse oximeter calibration guidance and WCAG 2.2. A named subject specialist manages your project from brief to delivery, and a second, independent reviewer checks the work before it reaches you.

  • Scored audit report of existing assets against a representation rubric — included in every engagement
  • Prioritized remediation list ranked by clinical/reputational risk — included in every engagement
  • Benchmark comparison against the client's actual patient demographic data — included in every engagement
  • Built against named standards, including FDA pulse oximeter calibration guidance, not a generic design pass
  • A published starting price: from $6,500, shown before any call
What is included What is not included

Scored audit report of existing assets against a representation rubricIncluded

Prioritized remediation list ranked by clinical/reputational riskIncluded

Benchmark comparison against the client's actual patient demographic dataIncluded

Redesigned or re-sourced assetsIncluded

Work outside the agreed scopeNot this

Brief → scoping → draft → delivered

Every engagement
  • Scored audit report of existing assets against a representation rubric
  • Prioritized remediation list ranked by clinical/reputational risk
  • Benchmark comparison against the client's actual patient demographic data
  • Redesigned or re-sourced assets
  • Updated internal imagery/style guidelines to prevent recurrence
From $6,500Published starting price
10–15 business daysFrom brief to final delivery
5 deliverablesDefined in every engagement
ISO 9001:2015Quality management certified · cert. H3CR9TCU20251212INDQM10N

Deliverables

Five Deliverables in Every Inclusive Representation Design Project

Every inclusive representation project includes the five deliverables below, prepared in-house by Pubrica’s medical illustrators, 3D animators and UX/UI designers rather than drawn from a template library.

Scored audit report of existing assets against a representation rubric Scored audit report of existing assets against a representation rubric.
Prioritized remediation list ranked by clinical/reputational risk Prioritized remediation list ranked by clinical/reputational risk.
Benchmark comparison against the client's actual patient demographic data Benchmark comparison against the client's actual patient demographic data.
Redesigned or re-sourced assets Redesigned or re-sourced assets (illustrations, photography, personas) for flagged items (redesign tier).
Updated internal imagery/style guidelines to prevent recurrence Updated internal imagery/style guidelines to prevent recurrence.

Service Tiers

Representation Audit and Targeted Redesign

Most flagged assets do not need a full reshoot. The audit identifies which assets carry clinical or reputational risk before you pay to replace any of them.

Audit — From $6,500Covers a structured audit of up to ~150 existing patient-facing assets (illustrations, stock photos, personas, iconography) against a representation rubric (skin tone/Massey-Martin scale, age, gender presentation, disability, body type, SES markers), benchmarked against the client's actual patient population, delivered as a scored findings report with flagged assets and remediation priority.
Redesign — scoped quoteRemaking the flagged assets, priced against: Number and type of assets to remake (illustration vs. photography vs. video vs. persona/journey-map content); Whether new photography/illustration requires original shoots or commissioned art versus curated premium stock; Depth of clinical accuracy review required (e.g., dermatology imagery needing melanin-range accuracy).
Choosing a TierIf your patient-facing imagery has not been audited against a representation rubric, we recommend starting with the audit, which shows how much redesign is needed.

Who we serve

Five Client Groups We Support with De-Biasing and Inclusive Representation Design

We support teams that produce patient education, campaign, device training, app and community health imagery.

Pharma and medtech marketing/communications teamsAuditing patient education materials
Hospital systems and health plansReviewing public-facing campaign and signage imagery
Medical device companiesPreparing IFU (instructions for use) and training illustrations
Digital health / SaMD companiesAuditing app onboarding and persona imagery
Health nonprofits and public health agenciesProducing community health education content

Compliance and Standards

Three Standards and Guidelines Applied to De-Biasing and Inclusive Representation Design

Each deliverable is checked against the standards and guidelines named below.

FDA

FDA pulse oximeter calibration guidance

Establishes regulatory precedent that skin-tone representation in validation/testing populations is a patient-safety issue, not just an aesthetic one, supporting the case for formal audits of patient-facing visual content.

WCAG

WCAG 2.2

Accessible color contrast and non-text-content guidance intersect with inclusive imagery work when illustrations or photos are also required to be perceivable by users with low vision or color-vision deficiency.

ISO9001:2015

Quality management (cert. H3CR9TCU20251212INDQM10N)

Our quality management system covers how each project is run, reviewed and documented.

Responsible Use of AI

Our Approach to AI Use in De-Biasing and Inclusive Representation Design

We use generative tools for drafting and design iteration only. We do not use them for any output that could be mistaken for verified clinical data or a real patient.

What we use it forLayout variations, colour systems, and first-pass drafts that a human then corrects against the brief and the brand or clinical standards that apply.
What we do not use it forGenerating any image, figure or quote presented as real clinical data, a real patient, or a verified result; and nothing goes out without a named reviewer's sign-off.
What goes in your declarationYour declaration states the tool, the stage at which it was used and the human oversight applied, because MLR/PRC reviewers, funders and regulators increasingly expect this to be stated.

Why We Do Not Publish AI Accuracy Figures

Accuracy figures for AI design and content tools are usually reported by the vendors that sell them.

For this reason, we do not quote an accuracy figure of our own. We tell you which tool was used on your project, at which stage, and what a named reviewer changed afterwards.

Our Process

How Our Inclusive Representation Design Process Works

You review a first draft before production is completed, so any misunderstanding of the brief is corrected at an early stage.

Step one

Submit Your Brief and Reference Material

Tell us which assets are in scope, who your patient population is and any brand or clinical constraints, and send the existing imagery, guidelines and demographic data we should work from.

Step two

Scoping Consultation

We confirm the audience, the applicable standards and, for scoped work, the factors that determine the final price, so the quote is clear before work begins.

Step three

Concept and First Draft

A subject specialist and the production team prepare the first version against the brief, and it is reviewed internally for accuracy before it reaches you.

Step four

Revisions and Final Delivery

We incorporate your revisions and deliver the files listed on this page, including the working files, so the material can be updated later without starting again.

Request a Free Scoping Assessment for Your Inclusive Representation Design Project

We set out the cost, the timeline and the applicable standards before you commit to anything. The assessment is free and takes two business days.

What you provide
The briefWhat the piece needs to do, and for whom
Reference materialExisting assets, brand or style guidelines, prior approved versions
The audienceClinician, patient, payer, investor or internal team
ConstraintsAnything that must or must not appear, and the standards that apply
The deadlineYour deadline, including any congress or submission window
Approval routeWho signs off, and whether MLR/PRC review sits in the loop

Our experts

Your Inclusive Representation Design Team

The same named team of subject specialists stays with your project from scoping to delivery.

Subject expertA subject matter expert matched to your topic

Decides which claims the work can make on the available evidence. The subject expert is matched to your topic and tells you clearly when the brief asks for something the evidence does not support.

OwnsScope, judgement, interpretation
Reads againstThe applicable standards for this work
FieldMatched to your topic
Dr. DivyaPhD in Life Science · second reviewer

Reviews the work independently of the first reviewer and reconciles the two reviews, because most errors in this work are factual. Disagreements are logged and adjudicated by a third reviewer.

OwnsIndependent second read
Reads againstThe applicable checklist
Adjudicated byA third reviewer
Dr. AntonyProduction and delivery lead

Responsible for file formats, compliance with the destination’s specification and the handover of working files, so the delivered files match your brief.

OwnsProduction and delivery
Reads againstThe destination's own specification
Second-checked byA second production reviewer
Mr. JohnCompliance and standards reviewer

Confirms that the deliverable meets the standards that apply to it, whether MLR, WCAG, a regulatory guidance or another governing body.

OwnsStandards and compliance review
Reads againstThe standards listed on this page
ToolsThe current published guidance for each

Evidence Base

Evidence Informing Our Inclusive Representation Design Approach

Each point below is sourced and assigned to a named member of the team. On request, we can direct you to the underlying study or the responsible reviewer.

01 A 2023 study in Health Promotion Practice analyzing 495 images across five...A 2023 study in Health Promotion Practice analyzing 495 images across five major stock libraries (Adobe Stock, Canva, Getty, Microsoft, Pixabay) found that searches like healthy eating and quitting smoking returned no images of people with dark skin tones, and vaccination was the only term where dark-skinned people made up a notable share (about 20%).
02 Images that were paywalled/premium on stock sites were significantly more likely to...Images that were paywalled/premium on stock sites were significantly more likely to depict minoritized people and darker skin tones than free images, meaning organizations with smaller budgets are structurally pushed toward less representative imagery.
03 An analysis of images in the New England Journal of Medicine found only 18%...An analysis of images in the New England Journal of Medicine found only 18% depicted non-White skin, and a 2018 study of 4,146 images in four widely used anatomy textbooks found just 4.5% showed dark skin tones.
04 Underrepresentation of darker skin tones in clinical and educational imagery is cited...Underrepresentation of darker skin tones in clinical and educational imagery is cited as one contributing pathway to real diagnostic disparities: malignant melanoma is notably underdiagnosed in darker skin, even though people of color are more likely to die from skin cancer when it occurs.
05 Pulse oximeters were shown to overestimate blood oxygen levels in Black...Pulse oximeters were shown to overestimate blood oxygen levels in Black patients during COVID-19, a bias that had been reported for years, and in January 2025 the FDA proposed draft guidance calling for larger clinical studies with more diverse skin tones than its 2013 recommendation of at least 15% darkly pigmented participants.

Packages

Inclusive Representation Design Pricing

The audit has a published starting price. Redesign is priced by scope once the audit shows how many assets need remaking.

Audit

Representation audit

Covers a structured audit of up to ~150 existing patient-facing assets (illustrations, stock photos, personas, iconography) against a representation rubric (skin tone/Massey-Martin scale, age, gender presentation, disability, body type, SES markers), benchmarked against the client's actual patient population, delivered as a scored findings report with flagged assets and remediation priority.

From $6,500Published starting price

Delivery 10–15 business days

  • ✓Scored audit report of existing assets against a representation rubric
  • ✓Prioritized remediation list ranked by clinical/reputational risk
  • ✓Benchmark comparison against the client's actual patient demographic data
Start with the audit
Redesign

Remediation & redesign

Scoped against: Number and type of assets to remake (illustration vs. photography vs. video vs. persona/journey-map content); Whether new photography/illustration requires original shoots or commissioned art versus curated premium stock; Depth of clinical accuracy review required (e.g., dermatology imagery needing melanin-range accuracy)

Scoped quoteAfter the audit, or on its own

Delivery Set at scoping

  • ✓Redesigned or re-sourced assets (illustrations, photography, personas) for flagged items (redesign tier)
  • ✓Updated internal imagery/style guidelines to prevent recurrence
Get a scoped quote

Quality Assurance

Our Service Commitment

Our service commitment, its limits and the remedy are set out below.

The Pubrica guarantee

Free Revision When Work Does Not Meet the Agreed Brief or Named Standard

Within the agreed scope, we revise any work that does not match the brief or a standard named on this page at no additional cost.

01

The brief is confirmed before production

Confirming the brief at scoping prevents misunderstandings that would otherwise require rework after delivery.

02

A named reviewer signs off before you see it

A named reviewer checks the work against the standards listed on this page.

03

AI use is disclosed, not hidden

We tell you which tool was used, at which stage, and what a reviewer changed afterwards.

04

Working files are yours

You receive the working files, so the material can be updated later without starting again.

Client Stories

“The illustration was scientifically accurate and the revisions were fast. It went into the deck without a single correction from medical affairs.”
ThomsonMarketing lead, medical device company

USA

De-Biasing & Inclusive Representation Design FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions About De-Biasing and Inclusive Representation Design

If yours is not here, ask an expert — no quote required.

Pubrica audits patient-facing imagery and content against a representation rubric and redesigns the assets the audit flags. We work with pharma and medtech communications teams, hospital systems and health plans, medical device and digital health companies and public health organizations. Our medical illustrators, 3D animators and UX/UI designers deliver a scored audit report, a prioritized remediation list, a benchmark against your patient demographic data, redesigned or re-sourced assets and updated imagery guidelines, with reference to FDA pulse oximeter calibration guidance and WCAG 2.2. A named subject specialist manages your project from brief to delivery, and a second, independent reviewer checks the work before it reaches you.

De-biasing and inclusive representation design is a structured review of patient-facing imagery against a representation rubric, followed by redesign where needed. The core deliverable is a scored audit report, and the full list appears on this page under Deliverables.

A 2023 study in Health Promotion Practice analyzing 495 images across five major stock libraries (Adobe Stock, Canva, Getty, Microsoft, Pixabay) found that searches like healthy eating and quitting smoking returned no images of people with dark skin tones, and vaccination was the only term where dark-skinned people made up a notable share (about 20%).

This is documented in published research and regulatory guidance, so our specialists treat it as a defined project requirement.

The audit starts from $6,500. It covers a structured audit of up to ~150 existing patient-facing assets (illustrations, stock photos, personas, iconography) against a representation rubric (skin tone/Massey-Martin scale, age, gender presentation, disability, body type, SES markers), benchmarked against your actual patient population and delivered as a scored findings report with flagged assets and remediation priorities.

Any redesign work that follows is scoped separately, because the number of assets that actually need remaking only becomes clear once the audit is done.

Pharma and medtech marketing/communications teams auditing patient education materials

Hospital systems and health plans reviewing public-facing campaign and signage imagery

Establishes regulatory precedent that skin-tone representation in validation/testing populations is a patient-safety issue, not just an aesthetic one, supporting the case for formal audits of patient-facing visual content.

We apply the standard from the start of the project rather than making compliance changes after a reviewer raises them.

Request a Free Scoping Assessment for Your Inclusive Representation Design Project

We set out the cost, the timeline and the applicable standards. The assessment is free and takes two business days.

Get a free quote

Regulations

Check your project against this rule

  1. 1Your work
  2. 2Your details
  3. 3Send
What do you need?

Material you send is held under signed confidentiality, with access limited to the assigned team and encrypted transfer. It is not used to train anything and is not passed to third-party tools. Ask for the agreement before you send anything you would rather cover first.