How to Structure your research article

This technique of research structure used by scientists. An organized procedure of experimental design, observation, and hypothesis testing are used to improve knowledge in this technique of inquiry. Now that you’ve considered those mentioned above, you may concentrate on structure. Scientific articles are divided into parts, each with its objective and here accumulated a list of them for you.

Table .1 Research structure papers ⁽²⁾

1. Title

A good title should be straightforward, concise, and precise. It should represent the study’s goal, rather than the study’s results, by mentioning the issue(s) that the research addressed. It shouldn’t be in the form of a question, and it shouldn’t include any creative or catchy terms or phrases.

• Abstract

The Abstract is the final part to be written, but it is probably the most essential because it is generally the first thing that people read, and it often determines whether or not they will read the whole essay. The Abstract is not a mini-paper but rather a brief overview of the text. The Journal requires a structured abstract of Hand Surgery to focus and emphasize key information.

• Introduction

The introduction starts with a wide perspective. The beginning point for your introduction should be one those displeasures the attention of the audience you’re trying to reach: worldwide readers of your chosen publication. The introduction concludes with an emphasis that is identical to that of the Results: this is frequently a declaration of the paper’s goal or purpose or main results or activities.

• Materials and methods

The Materials and Methods segment explains how the research was carried out. It’s the portion that’s the toughest to write. Many authors struggle to translate technical ideas and concepts into language that the reader can comprehend and relate to.

• Results

The structured display of the collected data is the single most important aspect of the Results section. This is usually the simplest section to write. The introduction has a clear declaration of aim, and the Materials and Methods section has a clear description of the measurement parameters used to assess that purpose.

• Discussion

The author has a lot of liberty in how they structure the Discussion section. Authors should summarise data and offer critical interpretations and findings in general. In addition, the present study’s findings should be compared to those previously published in the literature, with similarities and differences noted.

• Limitations

The clinical significance of experimental findings should be discussed in a basic science study, especially in a journal read primarily by practitioners. Finally, the authors should recognize the study’s limitations.

• Acknowledgement

You can thank people who helped with the manuscript here, but not to the point where authorship is justified. For instance, you can include technical assistance as well as writing and proofreading assistance in this section. The essential thing is to express gratitude to the funding agency or the organization that provided you with a grant proposalor scholarship.

• References

References, on average, include more errors than any other element of the article. It’s one of the most infuriating issues, and it gives editors a lot of grief. Because there are several tools accessible, it is now easy to prevent these issues. All scientific articles on which your work is based must be cited in the text. However, don’t over-inflate the document with too many references — it won’t improve it! Excessive self-citations and citations of research publications from the same location should be avoided ⁽³⁾.

Table .2 Simple rules for structuring paper⁽⁴⁾

Typical structure of a research paper

Introduction

State why the problem you address is important

State what is lacking in the current knowledge

State the objectives of your study or the research question

Methods

Describe the context and background of the study

Specify the study design

Describe the ‘population’ (patients, doctors, hospitals, etc.)

Describe the sampling strategy

Describe the intervention (if applicable)

Identify the main study variables

Describe data collection instruments and procedures

Outline analysis methods

Results

Report on data collection(SK3) and recruitment (response rates, etc.)

Describe participants (demographic, clinical condition, etc.)

Present key findings to the central research question

Present secondary findings (secondary outcomes, subgroup analyses, etc.)

Discussion

State the main findings of the study

Discuss the main results concerning previous research

Discuss policy and practise implications of the results

Analyze the strengths and limitations of the study

Offer perspectives for future work