Free scoping read. A written assessment of your manuscript in two business days, at no cost.

Start one
Contents

InsightsRegulatory intelligence

Regulatory briefJapan

Japan Now Requires Immediate Open Access for Publicly Funded Research

Following the Cabinet Office’s Basic Policy for Achieving Immediate Open Access, publicly funded research in Japan moved to immediate open access with no embargo for newly solicited projects from FY2025. It covers the three funders most Japanese researchers hold money from — JSPS KAKENHI, JST and AMED — and it comes with something most mandates do not have: you have to report the open-access status, with the DOI or URL, in your annual reporting. That reporting requirement is what turns it from a principle into a deadline (Nature, 2024).

Pubrica InsightsWritten by the regulatory and publication teams Published7 April 2026 Last checked7 October 2026 Reading time5 minutes Sources1
  • No embargo
  • From FY2025
  • KAKENHI · JST · AMED
  • Repository or gold OA
  • Reported annually

In force Japan

Instrument
Basic Policy for Achieving Immediate Open Access to Academic Papers
Issued by
Cabinet Office, Government of Japan
In force from
Newly solicited projects, FY2025 onwards
Applies to
Research funded through JSPS KAKENHI, JST and AMED
What you must do
Make the paper immediately open with no embargo, by deposit in an institutional repository, and report its open-access status with the DOI or URL in your annual report.

Read the instrument

Immediate, for the three funders that matter, with the status reported every year.

Three facts decide whether this applies to your project, and the third is the one people check last.

Timing

Immediate

No embargo. The paper is openly available from publication rather than after a permitted delay.

Scope

FY2025 onwards

Newly solicited projects from FY2025. An older grant under its original terms is not caught by it.

Proof

Annual report

The open-access status, with the DOI or URL, goes into your annual reporting. Intent is not enough.

Three routes satisfy it. Deposit in your institutional repository; deposit in a disciplinary repository such as Jxiv or one run by JST; or publish gold open access in a journal that makes the article open at publication. All three are acceptable, and the first two cost nothing, which is worth saying because a good deal of the anxiety about this policy is really anxiety about article processing charges that may not be necessary.

The reporting requirement is the part that changes behaviour. Most mandates state an obligation and leave compliance to be discovered later or not at all. This one asks you to write down, once a year, where each paper is openly available. That makes a missing deposit visible to you and to your institution at a predictable moment, which is a far more effective mechanism than a rule nobody checks — and it means the record has to be kept as you go rather than assembled the week the report is due.

For researchers publishing in English in international journals, which is most of the biomedical field, the practical question is the same one the NIH and Horizon Europe changes raise: does the journal permit immediate deposit of the accepted manuscript, and in which version? That is answerable in ten minutes during journal selection and expensive to answer after acceptance.

Four things to settle, in this order.

The first two are one-off. The last two repeat with every paper.

What makes this routine rather than annual panic

Check whether your grant is in scopeNewly solicited from FY2025 — older grants keep their terms
Pick the route onceInstitutional repository, Jxiv or JST, or gold open access
Confirm the journal permits itWhich version may be deposited, and when
Record the DOI or URL as you goIt is what the annual report asks for

The fourth is the one that decides how the year ends. A researcher who records the link at the moment of deposit spends ten minutes on the annual report; one who does not spends a week reconstructing where thirty papers went. Nothing about the policy is difficult — the difficulty is entirely in when the record gets made.

Where this one sits against the others.

Four funders, four different answers to the same question, and an author with grants from two of them has to satisfy the stricter one. Checked on 21 September 2026.

Immediate, embargoed, or neitherchecked 21 September 2026

NIH

No embargo · from 1 July 2025

Accepted manuscript to PubMed Central on acceptance. Deposit is free to the author, and a publisher may not charge differently for compliance.

Horizon Europe

No embargo · CC BY

Deposited in a trusted repository at publication, licensed CC BY. Article processing charges are reimbursable only for fully open-access journals, never hybrid ones.

Japan

No embargo · from FY2025

KAKENHI, JST and AMED, for newly solicited projects. Institutional repository, a disciplinary repository such as Jxiv, or gold open access — and the status reported annually.

UKRI

Since April 2022

In force for research articles submitted on or after 1 April 2022, and for monographs and book chapters published on or after 1 January 2024.

Singapore

12 months

A\*STAR, NRF and NMRC have each required open access within twelve months of publication since 2013 to 2015, with article processing charges grant-eligible. No national mandate.

Everywhere else

Journal policy

Where no funder mandate applies, the journal’s own self-archiving terms decide what you may deposit, in which version, and when.

The rule that binds is the strictest one that applies to you. A paper with an NIH grant and a Horizon Europe grant has to satisfy both, which in practice means immediate deposit of the accepted manuscript and a CC BY licence and a journal whose charges are reimbursable. That combination rules out a good many journals before you have written a word, which is why the decision belongs at the start rather than at submission.

Six questions researchers are asking.

It applies to newly solicited projects from FY2025 onwards. A grant awarded under earlier terms continues under those terms. If you hold both, the simplest position is to apply the stricter behaviour to everything rather than maintaining two processes, because immediate deposit costs nothing and tracking which paper belongs to which grant is where mistakes happen.

JSPS KAKENHI, JST — including Strategic Basic Research and FOREST — and AMED. Between them they account for most competitive research funding held by Japanese researchers in the sciences and biomedicine.

No. Depositing in your institutional repository, or in a disciplinary repository such as Jxiv or one operated by JST, satisfies the requirement without any charge. Gold open access is a permitted route rather than a required one, and the distinction is worth a great deal of money over a career.

The open-access status of your publications, with the DOI or the URL where each one is openly available. It is a small ask that has a large effect, because it makes an undeposited paper visible at a fixed point every year rather than never.

The obligation is the same, and the practical question becomes the journal’s self-archiving terms: which version you may deposit, and how soon. Most international journals permit deposit of the accepted manuscript, but the conditions vary enough that it is worth checking before submission rather than at acceptance.

Yes. The work is journal selection with the deposit terms checked, the manuscript prepared so the accepted version is usable, and the funding and licence statements written to match. We do that for researchers in Japan the same way we do it everywhere else, in English or alongside your own Japanese-language reporting.

The services this touches.

Compliance is mostly a writing and submission problem, and it is cheapest to solve before the paper goes out.

How to cite this article

Pick your referencing style and copy it. Your university or target journal may vary the punctuation — check its guide if it has one.

Pubrica Insights. (2026, April 7). Japan Now Requires Immediate Open Access for Publicly Funded Research. Pubrica. https://pubrica.com/insights/japan-immediate-open-access/

This article is written to be learned from. Cite it if you are referring to what it says, and cite the original sources for any evidence you take from it.

Sources

Every claim above rests on one of these. Each was read on the date shown; a requirement can move after that.

  1. 1Japan’s push to make all research open access is taking shape. (2024, May 31). Nature. A news report on the Cabinet Office policy, not the instrument itself; it carried a correction on 3 June 2024 concerning the commencement date.
    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01493-8 Read 8 October 2026.

open accessJapanimmediate OArepositoryfunder mandate

Your next step

Does this rule reach your work?

  1. 1Check whether it binds the work you have in hand
  2. 2Put the obligation where the deadline will be met
  3. 3Keep the evidence that you did
Read the official text

Or read how a compliance statement is checked, on the compliance statement checking page.

More in Regulatory intelligence

All of InsightsCalls and conferences

Japan Now Requires Immediate Open Access for Publicly Funded ResearchRegulatory intelligence

Official text

Get a free quote

Regulations

Check your project against this rule

  1. 1Your work
  2. 2Your details
  3. 3Send
What do you need?

Material you send is held under signed confidentiality, with access limited to the assigned team and encrypted transfer. It is not used to train anything and is not passed to third-party tools. Ask for the agreement before you send anything you would rather cover first.