Free scoping read. A written assessment of your manuscript in two business days, at no cost.

Start one
Contents

Academy · Research Writing · ARRIVE 2.0

ARRIVE 2.0: The Essential 10 and the Recommended Set for Reporting Animal Research

ARRIVE 2.0 comprises 21 items divided deliberately into two tiers, so that authors working under time constraints still report the ten items most important for judging whether the results of an animal study can be trusted.

Pubrica AcademyWritten by a preclinical research writing specialist Reviewed bya study design reviewer Published10 October 2026 Last checked10 October 2026 Reading time8 minutes Sources1 peer-reviewed

ARRIVE guidelines 2.0, from Percie du Sert and colleagues, set out 21 reporting items for in vivo animal research, split into the Essential 10 — the minimum any reporting of animal research should include — and a Recommended Set of a further 11 items that add important context and detail.

Learning objectives

  • Which items constitute the Essential 10 and why they were separated from the remainder.
  • What the Recommended Set adds beyond the Essential 10.
  • Why the two-tier structure exists, rather than one flat 21-item checklist.

Common misconceptions

  • “ARRIVE 2.0 is one 21-item checklist with no priority order.” The guideline deliberately separates the Essential 10 from the Recommended Set specifically because authors in practice could not reliably report all 21 items, and the Essential 10 represents the minimum the authors judged necessary to assess a study's reliability and interpret its results.
  • “The Essential 10 is only about animal welfare reporting.” The Essential 10 is about the information needed to assess scientific rigour and reduce research waste — study design, sample size, randomisation, blinding, outcome measures and statistical methods are all included alongside animal and procedure details.

The Essential 10

The Essential 10, as published on arriveguidelines.org and in the accompanying PLOS Biology paper, comprises: study design, sample size, inclusion and exclusion criteria, randomisation, blinding (masking), outcome measures, statistical methods, experimental animals, experimental procedures, and results1. These ten items were identified as the minimum needed for a reader to judge whether a study's design and analysis support its conclusions — omitting any one of them makes the study difficult or impossible to assess properly, regardless of how well the remaining items are reported.

The Recommended Set adds a further eleven items: abstract, background, objectives, ethical statement, housing and husbandry, animal care and monitoring, interpretation and scientific implications, generalisability/translation, protocol registration, data access, and declarations of interest and funding. These items add important context — particularly for reproducibility and for readers trying to judge how far results might generalise — but the guideline's authors treat them as a second tier, to be adopted once the Essential 10 is reliably in place.

Rationale for the two-tier structure

The two-tier structure exists because long, flat checklists tend in practice to be only partially completed, and the original 2010 ARRIVE guidelines suffered from inconsistent uptake. By explicitly ranking the Essential 10 as non-negotiable and the Recommended Set as a further, additive standard, ARRIVE 2.0 gives authors and reviewers a clear minimum standard to check first, rather than treating all 21 items as equally optional components of a general aim of thoroughness.

Key points

Key points

The 21 items of ARRIVE 2.0 are deliberately divided: the Essential 10 constitute the minimum required for assessing the rigour of a study, and the additional 11 items of the Recommended Set add context and reproducibility value. The division should be treated as an order of priority rather than as an optional extension.

Practical application

Practical application

  1. Check the Essential 10 first in every case. Before any other item, it should be confirmed that study design, sample size, inclusion and exclusion criteria, randomisation, blinding, outcome measures, statistical methods, animal details, procedures and results are all explicitly reported.
  2. Add the Recommended Set once the Essential 10 are complete. Ethical statement, housing/husbandry, protocol registration and the remaining Recommended Set items should be treated as the next layer, not as a replacement for the Essential 10.
  3. Use the current checklist from arriveguidelines.org rather than the 2010 version. ARRIVE 2.0 replaced the original 2010 guidelines; the current checklist should be obtained directly from the official site rather than from an older internal template.

Frequently asked questions

Many journals that publish animal research now require or strongly encourage ARRIVE 2.0 compliance as a condition of review or publication; authors should consult the instructions for authors of the specific journal.

ARRIVE 2.0 is designed for in vivo animal research broadly; some highly specialised study types may need supplementary, discipline-specific reporting on top of the core 21 items.

Reporting the Essential 10 completely and accurately is the stated minimum bar; the Recommended Set is additive and its absence does not invalidate Essential-10-compliant reporting, though reviewers may still ask for specific Recommended Set items depending on the study.

References

  1. Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology. 2020;18(7):e3000410. read 10 October 2026. View on PLOS Biology

Every source above is a peer-reviewed article, a publisher’s record of one, or a standard issued by the body that owns it. Each carries the date it was last read. Where a standard moves, this article is revised rather than left up with a note.

How to cite this article

Pick your referencing style and copy it. Your university or target journal may vary the punctuation — check its guide if it has one.

Pubrica Academy. (2026, October 10). ARRIVE 2.0: The Essential 10 and the Recommended Set for Reporting Animal Research. Pubrica. https://pubrica.com/academy/concepts-definitions/arrive-2-0-animal-research-reporting/

This article is written to be learned from. Cite it if you are referring to what it says; if you are using the evidence behind it, cite the sources listed above instead.

ARRIVE 2.0 Essential 10 check

Confirm before anything else in an animal-research manuscript.

[ ] Study design
[ ] Sample size
[ ] Inclusion and exclusion criteria
[ ] Randomisation
[ ] Blinding (masking)
[ ] Outcome measures
[ ] Statistical methods
[ ] Experimental animals
[ ] Experimental procedures
[ ] Results

Pubrica AcademyWritten and maintained by Pubrica’s subject matter experts. Articles are revised when the underlying standards change, and each article states the date on which it was last reviewed.

How Pubrica can help

Pubrica checks every animal-research manuscript against the Essential 10 first and then against the Recommended Set, so that no essential item is missing when reviewers assess ARRIVE compliance.

Find something else

Search the Pubrica Academy

Access is free and requires no account. Enter a topic, or open the full library to filter by category, sub-topic or resource type.

Assessment of manuscripts against the ARRIVE 2.0 Essential 10

A scoping assessment is free and takes two business days. It provides a written assessment of what the work requires and which specialist would undertake it.

Get a free quote

Regulations

Check your project against this rule

  1. 1Your work
  2. 2Your details
  3. 3Send
What do you need?

Material you send is held under signed confidentiality, with access limited to the assigned team and encrypted transfer. It is not used to train anything and is not passed to third-party tools. Ask for the agreement before you send anything you would rather cover first.