Free scoping read. A written assessment of your manuscript in two business days, at no cost.
Landscape, feasibility and evidence gap established before a protocol is written or a budget committed.
From the research question to a synthesis another team could run again and reproduce.
Pick the point in the study you are at.
Stage 01
See what is already known
Before designing anything, find out what the literature settles and what it does not.
Stage 02
Design the study
The design and the analysis plan, written before the first participant.
Stage 03
Win the funding
The proposal a panel can score against its own criteria.
Stage 04
Build and manage the data
Where the data will live, and the shape a regulator expects it in.
Stage 05
Analyse it
The numbers, and what they will and will not support.
Manuscripts, reports and expert documents written to the structure their destination demands.
For medical affairs and publications teams — the plan, the platform, the governance and the people who carry the science into the field.
Pick the stage of the publication plan.
Set the strategy
What the programme is claiming, and in what order.
Put governance round it
The SOPs and the steering committee that keep it defensible.
Build the materials
Everything the plan commits you to producing.
Equip the field
What the medical team carries into a conversation.
Listen and map
Who matters in the field, and what they are already saying.
The documents a regulator or an ethics committee reads — written to the version of the standard in force, not the one the template was built on.
Pick the point in the programme you are at.
Before the trial
The documents an ethics committee and an authority read first.
During and after the trial
What the data becomes once the last patient is out.
Build the submission
The dossier itself, and the words on the label.
Answer the authority
Questions come back with a clock on them.
Keep it current
A marketed product is a reporting obligation that does not stop.
The technical documentation a notified body assesses under MDR and IVDR — the plans that have to come first, the reports built against them, and the post-market work that keeps both current.
Pick the stage of the technical file.
Plan the evaluation
What you will claim, and the evidence route to it.
Write the evaluation
The reports a notified body reads line by line.
Build the technical file
Everything the file has to carry, in the order it is assessed.
After it is on the market
Surveillance and follow-up, on their own schedule.
The documents a payer or an HTA committee reads — a different audience from the regulator, asking whether it is worth it and whether they can afford it.
Pick the stage of the access case.
Build the evidence
What exists, and what a payer will say is missing.
Model the value
The economics, in the models an assessor will rerun themselves.
Write the dossier
The global case, and the national one built from it.
Submit in Europe
The joint assessment, on its own timetable.
For clinicians publishing alongside practice, where the bottleneck is time rather than ideas.
Editing that tests the argument and the evidence, not only the language it is written in.
Pick how deep the edit needs to go.
Rewrite and strengthen
Argument, structure and the claims the data actually support.
Tighten the language
Sentence by sentence, against a named style.
Final proof
The last pass, after the last change.
Across languages
Into English, or out of a machine draft.
Whole documents
A book, a thesis or a LaTeX source is edited as one piece rather than at a single depth.
Everything between a finished draft and an accepted paper, including the decision you did not want.
Pick the step you are on.
Prepare the manuscript
Turn finished research into a paper that argues its case.
Check before you send
Find what a reviewer would find, while it still costs nothing.
Choose a journal and submit
Pick a realistic target and meet everything it asks for.
Respond to reviewers
Answer the report in a way that changes the decision.
After acceptance
Get the work out, and get it seen.
Analysis plans, reproducible code and models reported to the standard the field expects.
Pick the stage of the analysis.
Collect the data
Gathered to a protocol, so it stands up to being questioned.
Build the model
The pipeline or the model, written to be rerun by someone else.
Read what it says
The part that decides whether any of it gets used.
Getting the finding in front of the people who are meant to act on it.
Pick what you need made, then how it travels.
Summarise it
The short forms a reader meets before the paper.
Show and tell it
The same findings in the formats people actually watch and present.
Illustrate it
Figures and cover art drawn for the journal, not clipped from it.
Get it out
Past your own field, in words a non-specialist can quote.
Outsourced editorial capacity for publishers and societies — the desk, the checks and the craft, independent of whoever does your production.
Pick the stage of the journal workflow.
Run the editorial office
Everything between submission and a decision.
Develop the manuscript
Work on the accepted paper before it goes to production.
Prepare for production
The passes that make a file findable as well as correct.
Protect the record
When something is wrong, and has to be shown to be put right.
Grow the journal
Getting into the databases that decide who finds you.
Audited, evidenced and remediated — conformance reports buyers accept, and the upstream advice that stops you paying for remediation forever.
Audited, evidenced, remediated — in that order.
Audit what you have
Test the real files against WCAG rather than against an intention.
Evidence it
The document a customer or a procurement team actually asks for.
Remediate it
Fix the files, including the parts no automated tool can write.
Fix it upstream
So the next file does not need remediating at all.
Curriculum, items and delivery for education providers and awarding bodies — mapped, analysed and packaged for the platform you actually run.
Pick the stage of the course.
Design the learning
Outcomes first, mapped to whatever standard you are judged against.
Write the content
Written by someone who knows the subject, not summarising it.
Build the assessment
Items that discriminate, tested before they are used on anyone.
Ship it
Into the platform you already run.
Design, immersive media and data presentation for the screen a patient, clinician or HCP actually looks at — not the manuscript.
Pick what the screen has to do.
Visualize & design
Illustration, interface and environment work built for a screen or a room, not a page.
Create & communicate
Video, written and modular content, cleared for MLR review and built to be reused.
Measure & present data
Trial and real-world data made explorable, for the people deciding what it means.
About us
Pubrica, a trading name of Guires.
Research, writing and publication support since 2009. ISO 9001:2015 certified, working to COPE and ICMJE.
The people and the standards behind the work.
What we publish, and who we work with.
What it costs, and someone to ask.
Pubrica Academy
Four tracks, following the work itself.
Free guidance for doctoral researchers, academics and life-science teams. 110 resources, 68 open to read today.
Track 01
Get the work onto the page so a reviewer can follow it.
34 of 46 open to read now
Track 02
Know what your design and your analysis actually support.
5 of 21 open to read now
Track 03
Turn the work into something a journal will accept.
8 of 21 open to read now
Track 04
Get it read, cited and found once it is out.
1 being written now
Pubrica Insights
Three streams, each read a different way.
What changed underneath your work, and what we did about it. 33 pieces, every one dated and naming the standard it turns on.
Stream 01
Regulators, funders, universities and standards bodies.
16 briefs open to read now
Stream 02
Journal policy, open access, disclosure and integrity.
1 more topic coming
Stream 03
HTA, payer evidence, pricing and the submissions behind them.
20 briefs open to read now
Stream 04
AI, electronic submission and digital health.
Stream 05
Work we delivered, and what it taught us.
Press Esc to close
Home/Journal Finder/Frontiers in Psychology
Want the full narrative guide — article types, word limits, reference style? Read the Academy formatting guide for this journal.
Regulations
Tell us your deadline and we will plan the work back from it.
Material you send is held under signed confidentiality, with access limited to the assigned team and encrypted transfer. It is not used to train anything and is not passed to third-party tools. Ask for the agreement before you send anything you would rather cover first.
What happens next: email is answered every day of the year, and a written scoping read takes two business days from the point we have the document. The reply names who read it and what they think the work is. Nobody can promise you a publication or an acceptance, and we do not.
Sent
Back Continue Send to Pubrica