Contents
Academy · Concepts & Definitions · Systematic review methods (workshop)
Systematic Review Methods: A Two-Session Workshop Guide
A recording of this workshop will be added once a cohort has completed it. This written session plan is divided into two sessions: the research question and search, followed by screening and synthesis.
This two-session workshop guide splits systematic review methods training into a first session covering question structuring, protocol development, and search strategy, and a second session (held after participants have had time to practice) covering screening, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment, and synthesis.
Learning objectives
- Why dividing this training into two sessions separated by a practice interval may be more effective than a single long session.
- The content and sequence of each of the two sessions.
- The materials participants should bring to each session to obtain practical experience.
Common misconceptions
- “Systematic review methods training works best as a single intensive session.” Skills such as search-strategy development and screening benefit from a practice interval between initial instruction and a follow-up session, since participants identify real, specific questions only after attempting the work themselves; a single long session does not allow for this.
Session one: research question and search strategy
Session one covers structuring the research question (PICO or a variant appropriate to the study design), writing the eligibility criteria and planned analysis approach for the protocol, registering the protocol (commonly via PROSPERO), and building a reproducible search strategy that combines controlled vocabulary and free-text terms, documented for each database. At the end of the session, each participant or team has a draft protocol and a preliminary search strategy to refine.
The practice interval between sessions
Between the two sessions, participants register their protocol, finalise and run their search strategy, and begin initial title and abstract screening on a subset of results. This interval, commonly one to three weeks depending on the group’s pace, brings genuine questions to light (such as ambiguous eligibility criteria or search results that do not match expectations), which session two is structured to address.
Session two: screening and synthesis
Session two covers the completion of title/abstract and full-text screening against the finalised eligibility criteria, the design and piloting of a data-extraction form, the assessment of risk of bias for each included study, and the selection and application of a synthesis approach (narrative synthesis, and meta-analysis where appropriate), working with participants’ actual reviews in progress rather than a hypothetical example.
Session recording
Recordings of a live run of both sessions, and the accompanying materials, will be added above once a cohort has run.
Key points
Key points
Dividing systematic review methods training into two sessions separated by a practice interval — question and search first, screening and synthesis second — allows the second session to address real, specific problems that arise only once participants have attempted the work.
Practical application
Practical application
- Use the interval between sessions for practical work, not only reading. Registering the protocol and running the search generate real questions that the second session can address directly.
- Bring current, in-progress review materials to the second session. The use of real rather than hypothetical material grounds the discussion of screening and extraction in participants’ own data.
- Pilot the data-extraction form on a small number of studies during the interval, if time allows. This identifies problems in form design before the full discussion in the second session.
Frequently asked questions
They can be combined, but the practice interval is what enables participants to identify genuine, specific questions for session two; combining the sessions forgoes that benefit.
Small teams or individual review groups are most suitable, since the discussion in session two is grounded in each group’s actual progress on its review.
The synthesis portion of session two covers the selection of an appropriate synthesis approach; training in specific software would typically require a separate, dedicated session.
References
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. read 10 October 2026. View on BMJ
- PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. University of York, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. read 10 October 2026. View PROSPERO
Every source above is a peer-reviewed article, a publisher’s record of one, or a standard issued by the body that owns it. Each carries the date it was last read. Where a standard moves, this article is revised rather than left up with a note.
How to cite this article
Pick your referencing style and copy it. Your university or target journal may vary the punctuation — check its guide if it has one.
Pubrica Academy. (2026, October 10). Systematic Review Methods: A Two-Session Workshop Guide. Pubrica. https://pubrica.com/academy/workshop-guides/systematic-review-methods-workshop/
Pubrica Academy. “Systematic Review Methods: A Two-Session Workshop Guide.” Pubrica, 10 Oct. 2026, pubrica.com/academy/workshop-guides/systematic-review-methods-workshop/.
Pubrica Academy (2026) Systematic Review Methods: A Two-Session Workshop Guide. Pubrica. Available at: https://pubrica.com/academy/workshop-guides/systematic-review-methods-workshop/ (Accessed: 15 October 2026).
Pubrica Academy. “Systematic Review Methods: A Two-Session Workshop Guide.” Pubrica. October 10, 2026. https://pubrica.com/academy/workshop-guides/systematic-review-methods-workshop/
Pubrica Academy, ‘Systematic Review Methods: A Two-Session Workshop Guide’ (Pubrica, 10 October 2026) <https://pubrica.com/academy/workshop-guides/systematic-review-methods-workshop/> accessed 15 October 2026.
Pubrica Academy. Systematic Review Methods: A Two-Session Workshop Guide. [Internet]. Pubrica; 2026 Oct 10 [cited 2026 Oct 15]. Available from: https://pubrica.com/academy/workshop-guides/systematic-review-methods-workshop/
Pubrica Academy, “Systematic Review Methods: A Two-Session Workshop Guide,” Pubrica, Oct. 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://pubrica.com/academy/workshop-guides/systematic-review-methods-workshop/
@misc{systematic_review_methods_workshop_2026,
author = {{Pubrica Academy}},
title = {Systematic Review Methods: A Two-Session Workshop Guide},
howpublished = {Pubrica},
year = {2026},
month = {oct},
url = {https://pubrica.com/academy/workshop-guides/systematic-review-methods-workshop/},
note = {Accessed: <span data-cite-acc="iso">2026-10-15</span>}
}This article is written to be learned from. Cite it if you are referring to what it says; if you are using the evidence behind it, cite the sources listed above instead.
Two-session plan
With a practice interval of 1-3 weeks between sessions.
Session 1: question structuring, protocol/eligibility criteria, PROSPERO registration, search strategy build — Practice gap: register protocol, finalise and run search, begin screening a subset — Session 2: complete screening, extraction form design/piloting, risk-of-bias assessment, synthesis approach
Pubrica AcademyWritten and maintained by Pubrica’s subject matter experts. Articles are revised when the underlying standards change, and each article states the date on which it was last reviewed.
How Pubrica can help
Pubrica delivers this two-session format for research teams, working with their own in-progress systematic reviews.