Free scoping read. A written assessment of your manuscript in two business days, at no cost.

Start one
Contents

Academy · Concepts & Definitions · Registering on PROSPERO (guide)

Registering a Protocol on PROSPERO: Fields Most Frequently Returned for Revision

A video walkthrough of this guide is in preparation. This written version focuses on the fields that most frequently cause a PROSPERO registration to be returned for revision.

Pubrica AcademyWritten by an information specialist Reviewed bya systematic review methodologist Published10 October 2026 Last checked10 October 2026 Reading time7 minutes Sources1 peer-reviewed

Registration requires completion of the required sections of the current PROSPERO registration form, including the review question, eligibility criteria and planned methods. The fields that most often require revision before a registration is accepted are the eligibility criteria, which must be specific and unambiguous rather than a general description of the topic; the search-strategy field, which requires substantive detail rather than a placeholder; and the anticipated start and completion dates, which must be realistic and consistent with the actual status of the review.

Learning objectives

  • The PROSPERO fields that most frequently prompt a request for revision.
  • The level of specificity required in PROSPERO’s eligibility-criteria field.
  • Why registration after the search has begun is a problem for which PROSPERO specifically screens.

Common misconceptions

  • “PROSPERO registration is a brief formality once the topic has been decided.” With required sections demanding specific, substantive content rather than placeholder text, a complete, high-quality registration requires considerable protocol development before submission.
  • “A review can be registered at any point before publication.” PROSPERO expects registration before the review has progressed to data extraction, and registrations submitted well after a search has been run are liable to be queried or flagged, since the purpose of the registry is to record the protocol before results are known.

Specifying eligibility criteria

PROSPERO expects specific, operational inclusion and exclusion criteria — defined population, intervention/exposure, comparator, and outcome parameters — not a general topic statement. A vague entry in this field (such as a restatement of the review’s title rather than its actual eligibility rules) is among the entries most commonly returned for further detail before registration is finalised.

This field expects a genuine description of the planned search — databases to be searched, key search concepts, and planned limits — rather than a placeholder statement that a search “will be conducted”. Because PROSPERO registration takes place before or very early in the search process, this field describes the plan, but that plan must be genuine and detailed rather than deferred.

Anticipated start and completion dates

PROSPERO requests the review’s start date and anticipated completion date, and these must be consistent with the review’s actual current status: a registration submitted well after the search has been run, with a start date predating that search, may attract scrutiny, since the core purpose of the registry is prospective, namely recording the protocol before the review’s results are known.

Video walkthrough to be added

Video walkthrough

A narrated video filling in a real PROSPERO registration form field by field, with the reasoning behind each entry, is in production and will be added above once complete.

Key points

Key points

The required sections of the PROSPERO form need specific, substantive content — operational eligibility criteria, a detailed search-strategy plan, and dates consistent with prospective rather than retrospective registration — and these three areas are where incomplete registrations are most often returned for revision.

Practical application

Practical application

  1. Write eligibility criteria as specific, operational rules rather than a restatement of the topic. Population, intervention or exposure, comparator and outcome parameters should be defined explicitly.
  2. Provide substantive planned detail in the search-strategy field. The databases and key search concepts should be named, rather than a placeholder statement being given.
  3. Register before the search has substantially progressed. The start date and status of the registration should be consistent with prospective registration.

Frequently asked questions

Yes — substantive changes can be recorded and dated in the registry, which is a normal part of protocol-driven research, as long as changes are transparently documented.

No — PROSPERO is widely used for health-related reviews specifically, while other registries exist for other fields; authors should check which registry is standard or required for the specific review topic and target journal.

No — registration records the protocol prospectively; it does not evaluate or guarantee the quality or eventual publication of the completed review.

References

  1. PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. University of York, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. read 10 October 2026. View PROSPERO

Every source above is a peer-reviewed article, a publisher’s record of one, or a standard issued by the body that owns it. Each carries the date it was last read. Where a standard moves, this article is revised rather than left up with a note.

How to cite this article

Pick your referencing style and copy it. Your university or target journal may vary the punctuation — check its guide if it has one.

Pubrica Academy. (2026, October 10). Registering a Protocol on PROSPERO: Fields Most Frequently Returned for Revision. Pubrica. https://pubrica.com/academy/video-guides/registering-a-protocol-on-prospero-guide/

This article is written to be learned from. Cite it if you are referring to what it says; if you are using the evidence behind it, cite the sources listed above instead.

PROSPERO field-quality check

Review before submitting registration.

[ ] Eligibility criteria: specific, operational population/intervention/comparator/outcome parameters, not a topic restatement
[ ] Search strategy field: real planned detail (databases, key concepts), not a placeholder statement
[ ] Start date and anticipated completion date: internally consistent with current review status
[ ] All required sections of the current registration form completed with substantive content

Pubrica AcademyWritten and maintained by Pubrica’s subject matter experts. Articles are revised when the underlying standards change, and each article states the date on which it was last reviewed.

How Pubrica can help

Pubrica assists research teams in preparing complete, substantively detailed PROSPERO registrations, with the aim of minimising requests for revision.

Find something else

Search the Pubrica Academy

Access is free and requires no account. Enter a topic, or open the full library to filter by category, sub-topic or resource type.

Pre-submission review of PROSPERO registrations

A scoping assessment is free and takes two business days. It provides a written assessment of what the work requires and which specialist would undertake it.

Get a free quote

Regulations

Check your project against this rule

  1. 1Your work
  2. 2Your details
  3. 3Send
What do you need?

Material you send is held under signed confidentiality, with access limited to the assigned team and encrypted transfer. It is not used to train anything and is not passed to third-party tools. Ask for the agreement before you send anything you would rather cover first.