Contents
Academy · Research Writing · CONSORT 2025
CONSORT 2025: Changes From CONSORT 2010 and Implications for Reporting Randomised Trials
CONSORT 2010 has been replaced. CONSORT 2025 updates the 25-item CONSORT 2010 checklist to a 30-item checklist through additions and revisions to its structure and content, which is significant for authors who continue to draft trial reports against the earlier version.
CONSORT 2025 is the updated Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement, published simultaneously in PLOS Medicine, The BMJ, JAMA, The Lancet and Nature Medicine on 14 April 2025, and it supersedes CONSORT 2010 for reporting randomised trials.
Learning objectives
- What changed between the 25-item CONSORT 2010 checklist and the 30-item CONSORT 2025 checklist.
- Which new items exist because of developments CONSORT 2010 could not have anticipated.
- How CONSORT 2025 relates to its family of trial-design extensions.
Common misconceptions
- “CONSORT 2025 is a light edit of CONSORT 2010.” CONSORT 2025 updates the 25-item CONSORT 2010 checklist to a 30-item checklist through additions and revisions to its structure and content — this is a structural revision, not a wording pass.
- “Any CONSORT extension automatically updates to match CONSORT 2025's numbering.” The CONSORT 2025 authors note explicitly that existing extensions (cluster trials, pilot and feasibility trials, harms, patient-reported outcomes, and others) will be aligned with the new statement over time; until an extension is formally updated, its current published version should be used alongside the 2025 core checklist.
Reasons for replacing CONSORT 2010
Hopewell and colleagues, writing for the SPIRIT-CONSORT executive group, describe a three-stage development process behind CONSORT 2025: a scoping review of the trial-reporting literature, a three-round Delphi survey (with 317, then 303, then 290 respondents), and a two-day expert consensus meeting held in March 20231. The explicit aim was to bring the statement in line with developments CONSORT 2010 predates — open-science expectations around registration and data sharing, a stronger expectation that harms are reported as rigorously as benefits, and growing attention to patient and public involvement in trial design.
New content in the 30-item checklist
CONSORT 2025 updates the 25-item CONSORT 2010 checklist to a 30-item checklist through additions and revisions to its structure and content1. The additions cluster around five themes: a data-sharing statement (item 4); authors' conflicts of interest (item 5b); patient and public involvement in the trial's design and conduct (item 8); eligibility of trial sites and interventionists, not just participants (item 12b); a dedicated harms-assessment item (item 15); and separate treatment of analysis populations and missing data (items 21b and 21c). A new "open science" grouping brings registration, protocol and analysis-plan access, data sharing, and funding/conflict-of-interest disclosure together under one heading, and content from the Harms, Outcomes, and Non-pharmacological Treatment extensions, plus the TIDieR intervention-reporting checklist, has been integrated directly into the core statement.
Relationship of the extensions to CONSORT 2025
The CONSORT extensions — for adaptive designs, cluster trials, crossover trials, early-phase trials, factorial trials, non-inferiority and equivalence trials, pragmatic trials, multi-arm trials, n-of-1 trials, pilot and feasibility trials, and within-person trials, among others — are not retired by CONSORT 2025. The 2025 authors state that each extension will be aligned with the new core statement over time; until that occurs, a trial that requires a specific extension should be reported using the core 30 items of CONSORT 2025 together with the current published version of that extension, rather than on the assumption that the extension has already been updated1.
Key points
Key points
CONSORT 2025 is a substantive structural update — 30 items rather than 25 — driven mainly by expectations concerning open science, harms reporting and patient involvement that CONSORT 2010 did not address; a trial report drafted from a CONSORT 2010 checklist will omit several items that are now required.
Practical application
Practical application
- Drafting should begin from the 2025 checklist rather than a saved CONSORT 2010 template. The current 30-item checklist should be obtained directly from consort-statement.org rather than from an older internal template.
- Authors should determine which extension, if any, applies, and use its current version alongside CONSORT 2025. An extension should not be assumed to have been updated to the CONSORT 2025 numbering unless its own publication states so.
- The items covering the five new themes should be drafted early in the writing process. Data sharing, author conflicts of interest, patient and public involvement, site and interventionist eligibility, and harms assessment are substantive sections rather than checkbox items, and require content drafted together with the rest of the manuscript.
Frequently asked questions
Journals set their own transition timelines, and the instructions for authors of the specific journal should be consulted; nevertheless, CONSORT 2025 should be treated as the current standard for any trial report now in preparation.
The reporting standard governs how the trial is described in the manuscript, not when the trial was conducted; a completed trial that is now being written up should therefore be reported against CONSORT 2025.
The current CONSORT 2025 checklist and supporting materials are maintained at consort-statement.org, which should be treated as the authoritative source over any cached or reformatted copy.
References
- Hopewell S, Chan A-W, Collins GS, et al. CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials. PLOS Medicine. 2025;22(4):e1004587. read 10 October 2026. View on PubMed Central
Every source above is a peer-reviewed article, a publisher’s record of one, or a standard issued by the body that owns it. Each carries the date it was last read. Where a standard moves, this article is revised rather than left up with a note.
How to cite this article
Pick your referencing style and copy it. Your university or target journal may vary the punctuation — check its guide if it has one.
Pubrica Academy. (2026, October 10). CONSORT 2025: Changes From CONSORT 2010 and Implications for Reporting Randomised Trials. Pubrica. https://pubrica.com/academy/concepts-definitions/consort-2025-updated-guideline/
Pubrica Academy. “CONSORT 2025: Changes From CONSORT 2010 and Implications for Reporting Randomised Trials.” Pubrica, 10 Oct. 2026, pubrica.com/academy/concepts-definitions/consort-2025-updated-guideline/.
Pubrica Academy (2026) CONSORT 2025: Changes From CONSORT 2010 and Implications for Reporting Randomised Trials. Pubrica. Available at: https://pubrica.com/academy/concepts-definitions/consort-2025-updated-guideline/ (Accessed: 15 October 2026).
Pubrica Academy. “CONSORT 2025: Changes From CONSORT 2010 and Implications for Reporting Randomised Trials.” Pubrica. October 10, 2026. https://pubrica.com/academy/concepts-definitions/consort-2025-updated-guideline/
Pubrica Academy, ‘CONSORT 2025: Changes From CONSORT 2010 and Implications for Reporting Randomised Trials’ (Pubrica, 10 October 2026) <https://pubrica.com/academy/concepts-definitions/consort-2025-updated-guideline/> accessed 15 October 2026.
Pubrica Academy. CONSORT 2025: Changes From CONSORT 2010 and Implications for Reporting Randomised Trials. [Internet]. Pubrica; 2026 Oct 10 [cited 2026 Oct 15]. Available from: https://pubrica.com/academy/concepts-definitions/consort-2025-updated-guideline/
Pubrica Academy, “CONSORT 2025: Changes From CONSORT 2010 and Implications for Reporting Randomised Trials,” Pubrica, Oct. 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://pubrica.com/academy/concepts-definitions/consort-2025-updated-guideline/
@misc{consort_2025_updated_guideline_2026,
author = {{Pubrica Academy}},
title = {CONSORT 2025: Changes From CONSORT 2010 and Implications for Reporting Randomised Trials},
howpublished = {Pubrica},
year = {2026},
month = {oct},
url = {https://pubrica.com/academy/concepts-definitions/consort-2025-updated-guideline/},
note = {Accessed: <span data-cite-acc="iso">2026-10-15</span>}
}This article is written to be learned from. Cite it if you are referring to what it says; if you are using the evidence behind it, cite the sources listed above instead.
CONSORT 2010 → 2025 gap check
For use on a draft prepared against the previous checklist.
[ ] Data sharing statement present (item 4) [ ] Authors' conflicts of interest stated (item 5b) [ ] Patient/public involvement described (item 8) [ ] Site and interventionist eligibility stated, not just participant eligibility (item 12b) [ ] Harms assessed and reported with the same rigour as benefits (item 15) [ ] Analysis populations and missing-data handling reported separately (items 21b, 21c) [ ] Relevant CONSORT extension identified and its current version checked
Pubrica AcademyWritten and maintained by Pubrica’s subject matter experts. Articles are revised when the underlying standards change, and each article states the date on which it was last reviewed.
How Pubrica can help
Pubrica checks trial manuscripts against the current CONSORT 2025 checklist item by item, including the five new themes, before submission.