Publication Support Service
Editing and Translation Services
Editing and Translation Service
Research Services
Physician Writing Service
Statistical Analyses
AI and ML Services
Research Impact
Publication Support Service
Editing and Translation Services
Editing and Translation Service
Research Services
Physician Writing Service
Statistical Analyses
AI and ML Services
Research Impact
Methods: The current investigation was conducted as a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA standards. We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases for relevant literature on the clinical efficacy of CI surgery using the proper key phrases (MeSH). The following information was retrieved from the selected articles: author’s name, journal name, research design, sample size and age, devices, findings, and outcomes.
Results: This review contained seventy-three papers that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There were 19 papers on unilateral CI surgery in adults, 17 on bilateral (sequential-simultaneous) CI surgery in adults, 9 on unilateral CI surgery in children, and 28 on bilateral (sequential-simultaneous) CI surgery in children. The involving unilateral CI in adults shown a considerable increase in perceptual ability. In comparison to unilateral CI, bilateral CI provides advantages in sound localisation and hearing in calm and condition. Age is not a decisive element in patients’ performance of post-CI outcomes.
Conclusion: For the vast majority of patients with mild to severe hearing loss, CI is a helpful assistance in communication and speech perception. To create stronger evidence, more research with big databases, patient registries with long-term follow-up data, higher-quality reporting, and longer length are required.
Keywords: Clinical efficacy, cochlea nerve, meningitis, surgical technique, hearing in noise, progressive hearing loss
Each order includes
WhatsApp us