OSF Preregistration Systematic Review: Key Insights
An OSF (Open Science Framework) preregistration systematic review is a research methodology that emphasizes transparency, accountability, and rigour in the process of conducting and reporting systematic reviews. OSF, a web-based platform designed to support open collaboration in science, provides a framework for researchers to preregister their systematic review protocols.
In the context of systematic reviews, OSF preregistration involves submitting a detailed plan of the review methodology to OSF before the research is conducted. This includes specifying the research question, search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction procedures, and analysis plan. By preregistering these details, researchers commit to a predetermined plan, reducing the risk of bias introduced during the review process.
The OSF preregistration for systematic reviews contributes to open science by making the research process more transparent and reproducible. It allows other researchers to access and scrutinize the review protocol, ensuring that the study was conducted as planned and minimizing the likelihood of selective reporting or post hoc changes that could compromise the integrity of the findings. Ultimately, an OSF preregistration systematic review enhances the reliability of pharmaceutical systematic review research, fosters a culture of openness in scientific inquiry and evidence synthesis, and promotes the responsible and ethical conduct of research.
References
- Heirene, Robert, et al. “Preregistration specificity & adherence: A review of preregistered gambling studies & cross-disciplinary comparison.” (2021).
Related topics:
☛ Meta-analysis writing service