When deciding to submit a manuscript, most authors are concerned about a journal’s Impact Factor (IF) and reputation. Recent research has shown that submission choices are influenced by a variety of factors, including peer review experiences, editorial transparency, and some journals’ retraction histories. Understanding these influences can help researchers select journals that afford them the greatest opportunity for successful and respected publication.
Dr.Nancy | Clinical and Medical Research Expert
03 Apr, 2025
Dr.Nancy | Clinical and Medical Research Expert
03 Apr, 2025
Published on April, 2025
Submitting a manuscript to a journal requires extensive formatting network guidelines, which ensure the manuscript is intended such that clarity, consistency, and editorial policies are observed. Journals observe rigorous standards for scientific content, and they also uphold rigorous standards for presentation, structure and formatting of content. A properly formatted manuscript facilitates the review processes and develops the presentation of the work from a readable and professional standpoint, and by presenting the developed work in this way, it helps develop a positive first impression with those who will make the initial judgments on the document including editors and reviewers. From the title page to references and any supplementary materials; every aspect of an academic engagement requires precise formatting.
When deciding to submit a manuscript, most authors are concerned about a journal’s Impact Factor (IF) and reputation. Recent research has shown that submission choices are influenced by a variety of factors, including peer review experiences, editorial transparency, and some journals’ retraction histories. Understanding these influences can help researchers select journals that afford them the greatest opportunity for successful and respected publication.
A study completed by Gaston et al. (2020) reviewed over 10 years of data across disciplines from 1000+ peer-reviewed journals. Important variables assessed were:
Parameter | Description |
Impact Factor (IF) | Annual fluctuations and trends |
ISI Journal Rankings | Changes in percentile-based journal rankings |
Retraction Records | Presence and frequency of article retractions |
Peer Review Reputation | Qualitative data from 55 case studies on author experiences |
Submission Volumes | Year-on-year submission counts linked to other variables |
The original parameters were correlated to comprehend the positive or negative aspects influencing manuscript submission trends across time.
The research indicated a statistically significant relationship between journal IF changes and submission rates:
Takeaway message for authors: Journals with increasing IFs are more competitive. Make sure your manuscript aligns well with the journal’s scope and standards before submitting!
Findings: Journals with one or more retractions exhibited an up to 17% decrease in new manuscript submissions the following year.
Journal Name | Retractions (Last 3 Years) | Submission Drop (%) |
Journal A | 3 | -14% |
Journal B | 0 | +7% |
Findings: In-depth case studies revealed that dissatisfaction with the peer review process strongly correlates with a drop in future submissions.
Case studies of 55 journals with substantial drops in submissions revealed similar issues:
Example: An author submitted to Journal C with an IF of 5.2. Even though the IF was strong, the author withdrew the manuscript after 7 months because there were no updates from the editors. Then, the author submitted to Journal D (IF 4.1), which is known for a 4-week turnaround. The paper was published in 2 months, and the author said he would not submit to Journal C again.
Authors should assess journals not only by IF but also by editorial efficiency, communication, and fairness.
Factor | Impact on Submissions | Author Implication |
Increase in Impact Factor | Increases | Expect more competition |
Retraction published | Decreases | Choose journals with clean records |
Reviewer dissatisfaction | Decreases | Seek journals with positive peer review feedback |
Good peer review reputation | Sustains or grows | Prefer journals known for fairness & speed |
When selecting a journal, consider the following:
These factors are equally as important as the IF because they determine your chances of your paper receiving a good review, being published quickly, and being respected by peers.
At Pubrica, we support authors with:
Ready to choose the right journal and get published without the stress?
Let our experts guide your submission journey.