Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses

Clinical professionals use systematic reviews and meta-analyses to implement evidence-based medicine in the healthcare industry. An improved continuum of quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses (QUROM) statement is Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). PRISMA encompasses both meta-analyses and systematic reviews. According to the PRISMA definition, a systematic review is “a review of a defined issue that employs systematic and explicit techniques to find, select, and critically evaluate relevant research and to gather and analyze data from the included studies.” To include several theoretical and practical advancements in the systematic review space, PRISMA was initially suggested in 2009 and later updated in 2020.

The PRISMA statement, popular with scientists, features a four-phase flow diagram and a list of 27 items. Improving the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses provides writers with a wealth of checkpoints and suggestions. It may be used for systematic reviews of any other sorts of research, primarily evaluations of therapies, as well as randomized trials and different types of research. It may also be used to assess the published systematic reviews critically. It must be made clear that this is not a tool for evaluating the caliber of a systematic review.

Authors’ Update: Keep up to date on industry advancements, support, and training.

Pubrica Connect: Read articles about research, technology, and health communities daily.

Researcher Academy:Improve your manuscript by learning academic writing skills.

Language editing by Pubrica Author Services:Before submitting your work, double-check that it is written in proper English.

Translation by Pubrica Author Services: Translate your work into English professionally.

Search engine optimization (SEO): Make your article more visible by using SEO.

Your paper, your way: Save time by making your first submission simple.