The CARE guidelines: developing clinical case reporting recommendations based on consensus

In brief

A case report is a narrative that explains a medical condition that one or more patients have experienced for medical, scientific, or educational objectives. Case Report Writing Services written without guidance from reporting standards are insufficiently rigorous to guide clinical practice or inform clinical study design. The case report guidelines were developed using a three-phase consensus process that included (1) literature research and interviews before the conference to produce items for the reporting criteria, (2) a face-to-face meeting to draught reporting guidelines and (3) post-meeting feedback, review, and pilot testing, followed by finalization of the case report guidelines.

Introduction

Clinical observations are often gathered in healthcare delivery settings and are presented in case reports. They have helped identify negative and positive side effects, recognizing new diseases, odd versions of customary conditions, and offering rare disorders. Case studies, for example, helped us comprehend the link between thalidomide and congenital malformations and the use of propranolol for the treatment of infant hemangiomas. Case reports can help clinicians develop ideas for future clinical investigations, assess global convergences of systems-oriented methods, and personalize and individualize therapies in clinical practice. In addition, case reports provide a structure for case-based learning in healthcare education and may make cross-cultural comparisons of healthcare education and Medical Case Study Report Writing.

Randomized controlled trials (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, or CONSORT), observational studies (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology, or STROBE), and systematic reviews and meta-analyses also have reporting criteria (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, or PRISMA). According to empirical data, the adoption of the CONSORT declaration as a guidance to writers by a journal has been linked to an increase in the completeness of published randomized trials. Although rules for writing adverse-event Case Study Reports have been published, there are no universal reporting requirements for case reports. Our main goal was to use a consensus-based method to set reporting requirements for case reports.

Consensus process

Phase 1: The authors and the steering committee examined the literature for articles about the role of case reports, publication recommendations, and surveys on reporting quality. Participants were asked (1) what information was necessary to be included in case-reporting criteria, (2) why they made their proposals, and (3) for references that supported their argument during the telephone conversation. The suggestions based on the literature review and interviews and their reasoning, references, and operational definitions are organized by theme.

Phase 2: Clarifications, views, reasons, operational definitions, and new ideas were all given throughout the open debate of each prospective item. The committee had decided on a set of preliminary Case Report Writing Help suggestions at the second day’s conclusion.

Phase 3: The steering committee modified the original checklist before sending it to the entire group for two assessment rounds (Phase 1 and 2 participants). The comments from the whole CARE group was integrated into the approved reporting requirements.

It is the responsibility of the reporting standards creators to establish a distribution and implementation strategy that encourages the use of the guidelines. There are numerous components to our efforts:

• The CARE standards will be presented at conferences and seminars worldwide, including the Peer Review and Biomedical Publication Congress in Chicago.
• The CARE guidelines are presently being pilot tested, and preliminary findings show that they are effective as designed. Extensions to the guidelines for specializations are in the mechanisms.
• The CARE guidelines and accompanying materials will be available in several languages on a dedicated website.

Limitations

Medical journals frequently require authors to address three problems, which are not included in our guidelines: (a) potential competing interests, (b) de-identification of patient-related data, and (c) ethics committee or Institutional Review Board (IRB) permission.

Conclusion

Clinical Case Study Report Writing has relevance, especially with the rising emphasis on customized care, as seen by the increase of case reports in an era where clinical trials and systematic reviews dominate the tables of content of medical journals. Unlike randomized controlled trials, case reports are individual accounts about the care of specific patients with a sample size of one. They may be examined after being consistently gathered and integrated into more enormous databases, allowing for the early detection of efficacy and hazards.

About Pubrica

Pubrica has worked as a medical writer for several years. Clinical Research, Pharmacology, Public Health, Regulatory Writing, Clinical Report Forms (Crf), Biostatistics, Psychology, Life Science, Dentistry, Radiology, Dermatology, Diabetology, Gynecology, Cardiology, Biochemistry, Forensics, Surgery, Neurology, Psychiatry, Genomics, Medical Device, Pharmaceutical, Nutraceutical, Fmcg Companies, Hospitals, Universities, Pubrica’s team of medical professionals provides unique medical writing

References

1. Riley D: Case reports in the era of clinical trials. Global Adv Health Med. 2013, 2 (2): 10-11. 10.7453/gahmj.2013.012.
2. Gagnier, J.J., Kienle, G., Altman, D.G. et al. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. J Med Case Reports 7, 223 (2013)