Determining the experimental design is key to the success, reliability, and validity of a research study. A well-thought-out design permits better data collection, reduces bias, and increases the chances that the results are reliable. This article intends to provide you with the steps and factors to consider aiding your decision in selecting the appropriate experimental design for your research study.
Table of Contents
Determining the experimental design is key to the success, reliability, and validity of a research study. A well-thought-out design permits better data collection, reduces bias, and increases the chances that the results are reliable. This article intends to provide you with the steps and factors to consider aiding your decision in selecting the appropriate experimental design for your research study.
Experimental design is a plan or a method that helps a researcher to conduct a study. It describes how the data will be collected; they describe how the study will be conducted; and they describe how variables are to be manipulated and controlled. A well-designed study can help the researcher to answer research questions and draw valid conclusions. [1],[2]
| Between-Subjects Design | Within-Subjects Design | Factorial Design | Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) |
| In a between-subjects design, participants in different groups are exposed to different conditions, with each group receiving a different treatment. Because you want to compare various treatment or condition levels, this design is better. | With a within-subjects design, the same participants are used in all the conditions of the study. Each participant is subjected to every treatment or condition. The within-subjects design is an effective design to use when you want to minimize between-group variance, as each participant can serve as their control. | Factorial design includes looking at all the levels of two or more independent variables (factors) together. Each factor has two or more levels. The key advantage is that factorial designs can examine the interaction among the variables studied, which results in a fuller understanding of the effects. [3] | Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are the highest in experimental designs. Participants are randomly assigned to either the treatment or control group. The randomization method to assign the participants reduces bias and confounding variables, making RCTs preferable for clinical trials and medical research. [4] |
| Research Question | Nature of the Variables | Sample Size | Control and Randomization |
| Your research question will drive the experimental design. If you are testing two treatments and comparing them, a between-subjects design may be appropriate. If you are looking for changes caused by a treatment over time, a within-subjects design may be more appropriate. | The number and type of variables in your study will influence the design, and if you are dealing with multiple factors, it may be necessary to engage factorial design to analyse the interaction between them. | In general, larger sample sizes yield more reliable results. Indeed, certain designs, one of which is between-subjects designs, require larger samples than do other designs because of differences in variability between groups. | To avoid bias, control and randomization are necessary. RCTs and factorial designs are the two designs that reduce bias with control and random assignment, which assigns participants and controls for other variables that may interfere with the effectiveness of the treatment. |
Make sure to clearly articulate your research question or hypothesis. You need to decide whether your study requires group comparison, the effect of a single treatment, or if there are multiple variables where you’re assessing interaction.
Classify your independent and dependent variables. The design should allow you to manipulate the independent variable and measure the effect on the dependent variable.
Depending on the degree of complexity of your research question and the variables you will be studying, decide between between-subjects, within-subjects, factorial, or RCT designs
Be sure that your design is ethical, especially when it involves human subjects! Consent and confidentiality must come first, and the design should work to minimize harm to subjects.
Evaluate the practical matters of carrying out the design, including time, resources, and sample size. Decide the degree of control and what type of confounding factors are involved.
Design Type | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Between-Subjects Design | Reduces carryover effects, easier to implement. | Requires a larger sample size, more variability. |
Within-Subjects Design | Requires fewer participants, controls for individual differences. | Potential for carryover effects or order bias. |
Factorial Design | Explores interactions between variables more efficiently. | It can be complex and require a large sample size. |
Randomized Controlled Trial | High internal validity minimizes bias. | Expensive and time-consuming, it requires a large sample. |
Selecting the appropriate experimental design is critical in obtaining valid, reliable, and useful research outcomes. By recognizing the nature of your research question, the related variables, and practical constraints, you can identify the design that will best serve your research agenda. Regardless of the design you select, whether it is between-subjects, within-subjects, factorial, or RCT, it is prudent to ensure that your study is methodologically sound and practical.
Need expert help with your experimental design? Pubrica offers end-to-end research design, analysis, and reporting support.