Mean and Mean difference are the two key statistical measures used in the statistical analysis. Both are essential for meta-analysis as well. Mean and Mean difference are used for the interpretation of a large set of values into a single number which explains the heterogeneity and variation among the individual values. However, one of a common challenge in meta-analysis is the unavailability of this data (mean and standard deviation).

Q & A Forum

Meta Analysis

Q: How can Standardized Mean Differences (SMDs) be interpreted using rules of thumb?

Cumulative Meta-Analysis_ A Key Tool for Evidence Synthesis

Effect Size

SMDs, often referred to as effect sizes, can be interpreted using commonly accepted guidelines, primarily derived from social science research. One widely used scale (Cohen, 1988) suggests: 

  • 0.2 = Small effect 
  • 0.5 = Moderate effect 
  • 0.8 = Large effect 

Other variations exist, such as: 

  • < 0.40 = Small effect 
  • 0.40 to 0.70 = Moderate effect 
  • > 0.70 = Large effect 

Reference

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. (2011). 12.6.2 Re-expressing SMDs using rules of thumb for effect sizes. The Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved from 

https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/chapter_12/12_6_2_re_expressing_smds_using_rules_of_thumb_for_effect_sizes.htm

Connect with us to explore how we can support you in maintaining academic integrity and enhancing the visibility of your research across the world!

This will close in 0 seconds