Critical checklists to support you on your scientific publication journey at each point

February 8, 2021
Recent trends, challenges and future prospects in literature surveillance of Pharmacovigilance
February 4, 2021
Five basic principles of successful scientific communication
February 11, 2021
Recent trends, challenges and future prospects in literature surveillance of Pharmacovigilance
February 4, 2021
Five basic principles of successful scientific communication
February 11, 2021

In-brief:

  • It is believed that to publish a paper in a respectable journal; you need to have a right preceding in publication.
  • Scientific publication is challenging but can achieve with complete hard work and dedication
  • Pubrica gives you some essential checklists for your scientific publication journey that will help you in every stage and also provides scientific publication support services

Introduction:

An enriching experience is the publishing journey. For months, often years, a researcher works on his/her article, thesis or academic book, and then a publication finds its way of revealing the world. When you are writing papers in foreign journals, you need to cross-check some items about your work and the journal that publishes your work. The publishing journey has to follow specific checklists to successfully and avail our scientific medical journal publication service.

Critical checklists to support you on your scientific publication journey:

Carrying out good study

The first step in writing a good research paper is to do your work well. It is a scientist or researcher’s primary task to create a good research issue and then work to produce results using journal publication support. Consider whether the problem is essential to your genre or subject’s current setting. Then, as your research issue, create a specific viewpoint. To improve your approach, dig into an authentic sample collection. A successful study is one that is validated by proof, and that corroborates the theory. Before you get into print, make your work one of these suitable substances.

Check for Title and Sub-title

The second item on the checklist is the title and sub-title of the report. In a single sentence, a title should be able to clarify the intent of the research. Any critical work explaining the analysis or its outcomes should also be included. A sub-title in explaining the work should be respectful of the title. You have to review to see whether the title is enticing enough to attract readers; if the research question and intent are clearly illustrated.

Proof-read

The third important thing to concentrate on is reading and editing your work with facts. For corrections, any published work should be checked. In producing quality content, proof-reading and checking is a significant move. However, a skilled proofreader should be employed to edit the work, since errors that do not occur to you also appear to other readers. You may edit your study from a journal paper publication service.

Correspond to Peer Reviewers

Open access journals these days provide authors and scientists with ample opportunities to publish papers in international journals. It means, though, that you have to finely edit and check your work, i.e. before you put it up for print, you have to find someone to review your work.It means that the work is genuine and a product of quality. A perfect way to build a peer-review network as an independent researcher is to correspond with fellow investigators, students and teachers. Correspond to them, ask them before submission to look up your job. There are also associations and scientific clubs with common interests that have members. Enter these networks in your area of interest to associate with researchers and peers and use research paper publishing services.

Select the Right Publication

You must pick the correct journal if you have worked on the manuscript or paper in the best possible way. These days, there are many journals and publishing houses that provide new authors, scientists, and researchers with the chance to introduce their work to the scientific world. However, for your research paper, which journal should be best is something you need to determine.Next, a few publications that publish works in your genre or area of study are shortlisted. For the impact factor of each journal you select, search some websites. To see if they are publishing important, authentic works, check some published articles in each journal.

Request for ISBN or DOI

For a theoretical paper or book these days, digital presence is a very significant prerequisite. You must be able to take your work out of several research papers by readers and citers. So, you must request DOI when you publish articles in foreign journals.Your publisher can allocate an ISBN if you publish a book, which will give your work a unique individuality in the digital and real world. Therefore, when you choose a publisher or magazine, ensure that these suits are available to you.

Uploading Your Files

It may seem to be the most straightforward process in the publishing path, but it can be the trickiest aspect that can lead to your work rejection. When you upload your article or manuscript, recheck the format, volume, style etc. specifications of the journals. Avoid errors which, on technical grounds, may cause rejection.

Conclusion:

You may need to check other items in the academic world, such as marketing or circulating your work, so that readers can find it and be interested in reading it. It would help if you verified your work’s potential relevance. To get an idea of your readership, you may also want to check with colleges, students and professors. But before you get into publication, the above seven checklists must accomplish and get support from Pubrica that offers research paper publication services.

References:

  1. Keen, A. (2007). Writing for publication: pressures, barriers and support strategies. Nurse education today27(5), 382-388.
  2. Rickard, C. M., McGrail, M. R., Jones, R., O’Meara, P., Robinson, A., Burley, M., & Ray-Barruel, G. (2009). Supporting academic publication: Evaluation of a writing course combined with writers’ support group. Nurse education today29(5), 516-521.

Comments are closed.

This will close in 0 seconds