Dr.Nanci | Research design and Mixed Methods Research.
19 Jan, 2025
Reason |
Description |
Cites Retracted Work |
When a retracted item is used in citations or references, leading to the propagation of unreliable information. |
Error in Data, Image, Analyses, Methods, Results, or Text |
Mistakes in data collection, image preparation, analysis, methodologies, results interpretation, or textual content [2] [3]. |
Ethical Violations by Author |
Actions by an author that contravene accepted ethical standards in research or publication [2]. |
Falsification/Fabrication of Data, Image, or Results |
Intentional manipulation of data images, or results to misrepresent findings. |
Informed/Patient ConsentNone/Withdrawn |
Failure to obtain or honor participant consent, or participants rescind their approval after learning more about risks or benefits. |
Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval |
Lack of approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) for human/animal studies [4]. |
Legal Reasons/Legal Threats |
Actions or decisions influenced by the threat of litigation or ongoing legal disputes [2]. |
Misconduct-Official Investigation/Finding |
Proven misconduct identified through an official investigation by a governing institution, corporation, or government agency. |
Plagiarism of Article, Data, Image, or Text |
Unauthorized use of another's work, including articles, data, images, or text, without proper citation or attribution. |
Results Not Reproducible |
The inability to replicate findings using the same methods and materials, casting doubt on the study’s validity [5]. |
Self-Plagiarism |
Republishing the same work or sections of it by the same authors without appropriate acknowledgment or citation. |
Unreliable Data, Image, or Results |
Questionable accuracy or validity of data, images, or results, undermining confidence in the findings [1]. |
Failure to adhere to ethical standards, such as obtaining informed consent or securing IRB/IACUC approval, can lead to retractions that significantly damage an author’s reputation [6].
Errors in data collection, analysis, or methodology are preventable causes of retractions. Rigorous review processes can help identify potential issues before publication [1].
The inability to reproduce results not only raises questions about the validity of a study but also impacts the credibility of the researchers and journal involved [7].
Both plagiarism and self-plagiarism undermine the originality of scholarly work. Proper citation practices and originality checks are critical to avoiding these pitfalls [1].
At Pubrica, we assist researchers in minimizing the risk of retractions by providing comprehensive support throughout the publication process:
Detailed review of manuscripts to identify potential ethical, methodological, or citation issues.
Advanced plagiarism checks to identify and rectify instances of potential duplication or improper citation.
Rigorous data analysis to confirm the reliability and reproducibility of results.
Training and workshops through Pubrica Academy on ethical publishing practices and preventing common causes of retractions [1].
Retractions are an essential mechanism for upholding the integrity of scientific literature, but they come with significant implications for authors, journals, and the broader research community. By understanding the common causes of retractions and implementing robust preventive measures, researchers can safeguard the credibility of their work.
Contact Pubrica today to learn how our expert services can help you navigate the complexities of scholarly publishing and ensure the reliability of your research.